News:

About us: a forum for monotheists, and discussion of Islam based on The Quran

Main Menu

For those who like Modern Philosophy.

Started by L.Hu, November 29, 2008, 05:00:35 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Which do you prefer

Ancient philosophy
1 (25%)
Medieval philosophy
1 (25%)
Modern philosophy
2 (50%)

Total Members Voted: 4

L.Hu

In this thread we can discuss modern philosophy from Descartes to Adorno. We can discuss Deconstruction, Modernism, Post-Modernism, Structuralism, Post-Structuralism, Marxism, Althusserian marxism, Phenomenology, Existentialism, Positivism, Ordinary Language, Idealism, Realism, Anti-Realism, Process-philosophy, Rationalism, Irrationalism, Humanism, Anti-Humanism, Fascism, Communism, Pragmatism, and so on. If you want to discuss individual modern philosophers we can talk about Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, Rene Descartes, Benedict de Spinoza, John Locke, David Hume, George Berkeley, Immanuel Kant, Georg Hegel, Soren Kierkegaard, John Mill, Jeremy Bentham, Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, Herbert Mead, John Dewey, Friedrich Nietzsche, Gottlob Frege, Karl Marx, Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Jean Paul Sarte, Albert Camus, Simone de Beavoir, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Bertand Russell, G.E. Moore, Alfred North Whitehead, Thomas Kuhn, Paul Feyerband, Karl Popper, W.V.O. Quine, Alfred Jules Ayer, John Searle, Sigmund Freud, Carl C. Jung, Albert Einstein, Henri Bergson, Karl Jaspers, Immanuel Levinas, Blanchot, Bataille, Buber, Marcuse, Theodor Adorno, Horkheimer, Paul Ricoer, Habermas, Gadamer, Claude Levi-Strass, Lacan, Michael Foucalt, Derrida, Barthes, Deleuze, Muhammad Iqbal, Kahil Jibran, John Langshaw Austin, John Wisdom, Avrum Stroll, and the countless others. We can talk about Analytic philosophy or Continental philosophy. Or perhaps political philosophy or literary theory. Ethics, Ontology, aesthetics, Philosophy of language, Philosophy of Sceince, Hermentics everthing related to modern philosophy. Even ideas not from philosophy but of important relevance to it like the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, linguistics, Quantum phyiscs, the theory of Relativity, neurosceince, anything that can change are view of the world is relavant to philosophy. I hope people will discuss modern philosophy on this thread. It will be fun.

L.Hu


IronSky

Peace to all,,

Thats alot of  "isms"  to discuss.

L.Hu

You got that right. But man's restless mind never ceases to imagine, contemplate, and reflect. Thus man's countless reflections result in all of the mentioned dizzing "isms". And all those "isms" mentioned are only the mere surface. Theres much more. But to you IronSky which ism do you think you might like on the basis of mere name. I like Phenomenology, Existentialism, Pragmatism, Process-philosophy, and a countless more. I despise Modernism, but I like Post-Modernism. But there are countless more philosophical systems and if you know any of them mention them, and if you know alot about them lets discuss. Oh did I forget to mention the Frankfurt School and Critical Theory. Sadly Critical Theory can only talk, it cant walk. Note that even dumb and foolish ideologies like Fascism and Nazism are philosophys with there own facinating ideas that are worth the hearing. So lets discuss. Individual philosophers are okay too.

IronSky

Peace to all,

LHu,  I do read alot and love philosophy, but im afraid I wont be able to have any deep  debates over any particular school of thought,  I did study fascism quite abit before,  and stoicism has alot of principles i like,  other than that, im probably not too well read.

Kurt

L.Hu

Ah Stoicism. Intresting people, the stoics. In modern philosophy Albert Camus is like a stoic but without the principles and philosphical calmness. I find his conception of life as absurdity enlighting. His view of philosophical rebellion intresting. Basicilly a stoic without the light.

Lobster

Okay I don't know if utilitarianism is up there. I like utilitarianism (it's a bitch to spell though). Utilitarianism is not perfect but a very good ethical theory (is theory the right word?).
`What lies before us and what lies behind us is nothing compared to what lies within us.` - Emerson

'Phoenix! You are in Hot water, maybe you should change your name to Lobster.' - Khalil

L.Hu

Sorry for not including utilitarianism. Even though in theory utilitarianism seems nice theres something about it that just bugs me. Also I would prefer John Staurt Mill's utilitarianism to Jeremy Bentham. Bentham did not take into account the shades of pleasure or happyness. Mill was more reasonable. I like virtue ethics though. Not Aristotle's old one but the modern theory. Meaning Alasdair MacIntyre's virtue ethics. Still utilitarianism is awesome.

L.Hu

String/M Theory along with Many-Worlds theory is somewhat disturbing. I am dead in another universe which is right here. Hitler succeded in conqering the world in another universe which is right here. And dinouasaurs exist in another universe which is right here. The Cophenhagen intrepation is more comfortable. But String/M Theory along with Many-Worlds theory may explain God's justice. Every outcome happened. Thus nobody was fully hurt, since a person may be a loser here, but there a victor. America bombs Japan in 1945, and Japan does the exact same thing to America at the same time. All things that could happen happen. So no real injustice. Its freaky but its a real theory thats taken seriously by sceintists. Also reality is 11 diminsions. Of cource its a theory (actully two String/M Theory and Many-Worlds theory there diffrent but similar, although the more weird one is String/M Theory, and the more disturbing Many-Worlds theory). But they are taken seriously, and many sceintists accept them. There also becoming more popular with physicists. So as weird as they are there's a good chance these two theorys are true. So maybe Hitler died with 6 million Germans, who were being annihilated in a holucast started by jews. Weird.

L.Hu

Have any of you read The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge by Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckmann. Changes your view of things.