Imam Al Nawawiy's understanding of kufr.

[Bigmo]

The passage from Imam An-Nawawiy?s Rawdat At-Taalibiin

1.A person who calls the Prophet ﷺ as black has blasphemed and become infidel as he has attributed to him a trait that is not his.

2.A person who says that the Prophet ﷺ died before he got revelation has blasphemed and become infidel as he has attributed to him a trait that is not his.

3.A person says that the Prophet ﷺ was not Qurashiy, that is, from the Quraysh tribe, has blasphemed and become infidel as he has attributed to him a trait that is not his.

4.A person who says that prophethood is acquired or earned due to one?s deeds has blasphemed and become infidel EVEN IF he doesn?t directly claim prophethood.

5.A person who says that he can reach the rank of prophethood due to the purity of his heart has blasphemed and become kafir EVEN IF he doesn?t directly claim prophethood.

6.A person who says that he receives prophetic revelation (wahiy) has blasphemed and become kafir EVEN IF he does not directly claim prophethood.

7.A person who says that he enters jannah, or eats from its fruits or embraces its houris, he has become a kafir.

8.A person who negates any text of the Quran,  he is a kafir.

9.A person who negates a Sunnah/saying of the Prophet ﷺ that is conclusively taken upon its explicit meanings, he has certainly become kafir.

10.A person who does not do takfeer (declare kafir) of people who profess a faith other than Islam, such as christians, jews, buddhists, atheists, etc. ? he is a kafir by the consensus of scholars ? EVEN IF he claims to be Muslim or acts like them.

11.A person who even DOUBTS in the takfeer of people who profess a faith other than Islam, he is a kafir by consensus of scholars ? EVEN IF he claims to be Muslim or acts like them.

12.A person who authenticates or praises or appraises the faith/s of those who profess a religion other than Islam ? he is a kafir by the consensus of scholars ? EVEN IF he claims to be Muslim or acts like them.

13.A person who says implicitly or explicitly, that the ENTIRE Muslim ummah is misguided, he is a kafir by the consensus of scholars ? EVEN IF he claims to be Muslim or acts like them.

14.A person who does takfeer of the sahaba (companions of the Prophet ﷺ) ? he is a kafir by the consensus of scholars ? EVEN IF he claims to be Muslim or acts like them.

15.A person who does deeds upon which the Muslim ummah is unanimous that they can?t be committed except by a kafir ? he is a kafir by the consensus of scholars ? EVEN IF he claims to be Muslim or acts like them. Such deeds include things like wearing the cross, prostrating to the cross, prostrating to fire, prostrating to idols, walking to churches, synagogues, temples, etc. along with their congregations, wearing their specific attires and uniforms like their zunnar (sashes/ropes they tie around the waist), wearing the jewish skull caps, growing one?s sidelocks like the jews, wearing jewish-specific hats, wearing christian priests head gear, wearing the specific attire of buddhist monks, marking one?s forehead with markings specific to hindus, tying and braiding one?s hairs and beards like the hindus and sikhs do, joining their choirs and/or singing their religious songs, and other such things.

16.Likewise, a person who denies the existence or sanctity of Holy Makkah,or the Ka?bah, or the Holy Mosque, he is a kafir by consensus. Also note that the same rulings would apply to denying the existence and/or sanctity of the Prophet?s ﷺ mosque in Madinah.

17.Likewise, a person who denies an integral or the sanctity, or the obligation of the Hajj, he is a kafir by consensus. Also note that denial of the sanctity or the obligation of any obligatory act of worship or its integrals (like the number of rak?ats in prayers) constitutes apostasy.

18.Likewise, a person who doubts the Makkah known to Muslims as being the real Makkah, he too is a kafir by consensus.

19.Just as a person who denies any part of the text of the Quran is a kafir ? a person becomes a filthy infidel even by changing any part of the Quran, either changing directly the textual content, or by changing the established meaning/implication espoused by any part of the Quran   as taught by the Prophet ﷺ and his inheritors the sahaba. 

20.A person who denies the miracles of the prophets becomes a filthy infidel by consensus of Muslim scholars, for he is denying many explicit verses of the Quran. 

21.A person who says that the creation of the skies and the earth are not proofs for Allah?s existence, has become a kafir.

22.A person who denies paradise, or hellfire, or rising from the dead on the day of judgment, or the giving account of one?s deeds ? he has become a filthy infidel by consensus of Muslim scholars.

23.A person who accepts paradise and/or hellfire and/or rising from the dead on the day of judgment and/or giving account for his deeds ? but still tries to be smart and says that the meanings and implications of these things are something other than that unanimously known by Muslims (which means that those are the meanings taught by the Prophet ﷺ and passed on by mass transmission) ? he too is a kafir by consensus of scholars.

24.A person who says that imams are superior to prophets, he is a kafir. Please also note that saying that ANY non-prophet IS ? or CAN BE ? equal to or superior to ANY prophet  ? is kufr.

http://iloveimamrabbani.wordpress.com/tag/shafiiys-call-christians-and-jews-kafirs/

[good logic]

Peace Bigmo.

Thank you for your post on the other thread.

Also thank you for this info.

Peace.

[StopS]

Life can be so easy! Just believe what I believe - or I will kill you.

[huruf]

It would have been much better if he had paraded naked. ?My God!

Salaam

[Indelwyn]

Well I am in deep $hit!



Thanks Bigmo, As always I love reading your posts!

[Maha]

The passage from Imam An-Nawawiy?s Rawdat At-Taalibiin

1.A person who calls the Prophet ﷺ as black has blasphemed and become infidel as he has attributed to him a trait that is not his.

2.A person who says that the Prophet ﷺ died before he got revelation has blasphemed and become infidel as he has attributed to him a trait that is not his.

3.A person says that the Prophet ﷺ was not Qurashiy, that is, from the Quraysh tribe, has blasphemed and become infidel as he has attributed to him a trait that is not his.

4.A person who says that prophethood is acquired or earned due to one?s deeds has blasphemed and become infidel EVEN IF he doesn?t directly claim prophethood.

5.A person who says that he can reach the rank of prophethood due to the purity of his heart has blasphemed and become kafir EVEN IF he doesn?t directly claim prophethood.

6.A person who says that he receives prophetic revelation (wahiy) has blasphemed and become kafir EVEN IF he does not directly claim prophethood.

7.A person who says that he enters jannah, or eats from its fruits or embraces its houris, he has become a kafir.

8.A person who negates any text of the Quran,  he is a kafir.

9.A person who negates a Sunnah/saying of the Prophet ﷺ that is conclusively taken upon its explicit meanings, he has certainly become kafir.

10.A person who does not do takfeer (declare kafir) of people who profess a faith other than Islam, such as christians, jews, buddhists, atheists, etc. ? he is a kafir by the consensus of scholars ? EVEN IF he claims to be Muslim or acts like them.

11.A person who even DOUBTS in the takfeer of people who profess a faith other than Islam, he is a kafir by consensus of scholars ? EVEN IF he claims to be Muslim or acts like them.

12.A person who authenticates or praises or appraises the faith/s of those who profess a religion other than Islam ? he is a kafir by the consensus of scholars ? EVEN IF he claims to be Muslim or acts like them.

13.A person who says implicitly or explicitly, that the ENTIRE Muslim ummah is misguided, he is a kafir by the consensus of scholars ? EVEN IF he claims to be Muslim or acts like them.

14.A person who does takfeer of the sahaba (companions of the Prophet ﷺ) ? he is a kafir by the consensus of scholars ? EVEN IF he claims to be Muslim or acts like them.

15.A person who does deeds upon which the Muslim ummah is unanimous that they can?t be committed except by a kafir ? he is a kafir by the consensus of scholars ? EVEN IF he claims to be Muslim or acts like them. Such deeds include things like wearing the cross, prostrating to the cross, prostrating to fire, prostrating to idols, walking to churches, synagogues, temples, etc. along with their congregations, wearing their specific attires and uniforms like their zunnar (sashes/ropes they tie around the waist), wearing the jewish skull caps, growing one?s sidelocks like the jews, wearing jewish-specific hats, wearing christian priests head gear, wearing the specific attire of buddhist monks, marking one?s forehead with markings specific to hindus, tying and braiding one?s hairs and beards like the hindus and sikhs do, joining their choirs and/or singing their religious songs, and other such things.

16.Likewise, a person who denies the existence or sanctity of Holy Makkah,or the Ka?bah, or the Holy Mosque, he is a kafir by consensus. Also note that the same rulings would apply to denying the existence and/or sanctity of the Prophet?s ﷺ mosque in Madinah.

17.Likewise, a person who denies an integral or the sanctity, or the obligation of the Hajj, he is a kafir by consensus. Also note that denial of the sanctity or the obligation of any obligatory act of worship or its integrals (like the number of rak?ats in prayers) constitutes apostasy.

18.Likewise, a person who doubts the Makkah known to Muslims as being the real Makkah, he too is a kafir by consensus.

19.Just as a person who denies any part of the text of the Quran is a kafir ? a person becomes a filthy infidel even by changing any part of the Quran, either changing directly the textual content, or by changing the established meaning/implication espoused by any part of the Quran   as taught by the Prophet ﷺ and his inheritors the sahaba. 

20.A person who denies the miracles of the prophets becomes a filthy infidel by consensus of Muslim scholars, for he is denying many explicit verses of the Quran. 

21.A person who says that the creation of the skies and the earth are not proofs for Allah?s existence, has become a kafir.

22.A person who denies paradise, or hellfire, or rising from the dead on the day of judgment, or the giving account of one?s deeds ? he has become a filthy infidel by consensus of Muslim scholars.

23.A person who accepts paradise and/or hellfire and/or rising from the dead on the day of judgment and/or giving account for his deeds ? but still tries to be smart and says that the meanings and implications of these things are something other than that unanimously known by Muslims (which means that those are the meanings taught by the Prophet ﷺ and passed on by mass transmission) ? he too is a kafir by consensus of scholars.

24.A person who says that imams are superior to prophets, he is a kafir. Please also note that saying that ANY non-prophet IS ? or CAN BE ? equal to or superior to ANY prophet  ? is kufr.

http://iloveimamrabbani.wordpress.com/tag/shafiiys-call-christians-and-jews-kafirs/

ARE YOU SERIOUS  Even the crazy blasphemy law in Pakistan seems much more civilized then the above crap. 

[Maha]

By the way, what's wrong with the prophet being black?? Why is that considered kufr
Imam nawawy was a blody racist 

[Bigmo]

Life can be so easy! Just believe what I believe - or I will kill you.

EXACTLY!

as taught by the Prophet and his inheritors the sahaba

Very sneaky and dishonest. Typical Shafis. The Quran is a constant headache for them.




In Shāfi'ī's source theory the possibility of abrogation between the Sunna and the Qur'ān was vehemently denied:

Arguing determinedly that any verbal discrepancies between the Qur'ān and the reported sayings or reports of the practices of Muhammed- the Sunna of the Prophet- were merely illusory and could always be removed on the basis of a satisfactory understanding of the mechanism of revelation and the function of the prophet-figure, Shāfi'ī set his face decidedly against any acceptance of the idea then current that in all such cases the Qur'ān had abrogated the Sunna, or the Sunna the Qur'ān.[12][13]

This stance was a reaction to larger developments within Islamic jurisprudence, particularly the reformulation of the Fiqh away from early foreign or regional influences[14] and toward more eminently Islamic bases such as the Qur'ān. This assertion of Qur'ānic primacy was accompanied by calls for an abandonment of the Sunna. Shāfi'ī's insistence upon the impossibility of contradiction between Sunna and Qur'ān can thus be seen as one component in this larger effort of rescuing the Sunna:

He campaigned tirelessly to justify use of the Sunna as the second primary source alongside the Kur'ān against those who would accord the hadīth no role in the derivation of the sharī'a on the argument that the degree of conflict in the hadīth, the inadequacies of the guarantee against corruption, fraud or error afforded by the isnāds rendered the hadīth unfit for the sacred role of declaring the divine intent underlying the Kur'ān's declarations.[15]

Asked point-blank whether the Sunna could ever be abrogated by the Qur'ān, Shāfi'ī had bluntly replied [in the Risāla] that that could never happen. Were the Sunna to be abrogated by the Qur'ān, the Prophet would immediately introduce a second sunna to indicate that his first sunna had been abrogated by his second sunna- in order to demonstrate that a thing can be abrogated only by its like (mithlihi) [ cf. Q.2:106].[16]


Later scholars, writing when the juridicial legitimacy of the Sunna could be taken for granted (thanks largely to Shāfi'ī's efforts!), were less inclined to adopt his inflexible stance. To their minds the reality of this sort of inter-source abrogation was proven by several "indisputable" instances: the changing of the qibla towards Mecca and away from Jerusalem, and the introduction of the penalty of stoning for adultery. The following passage from Qurtubī (al-Jāmi' li ahkām al-Qur'ān) is representative in this regard:

...the Qur'ān may be naskhed by the Qur'ān and the Sunna by the Sunna. The Qur'ān may, in addition, be naskhed by the Sunna, as has occurred in the case of Q.2:180, which was replaced by the Sunna ruling: no wasiya [i.e. extra bequest] in favor of an heir. Mālik admitted this principle, but Shāfi'ī denied it, although the fuqahā all admit, in the instance of the penalty for adultery, that the flogging element of Q.24:2 has been allowed to lapse in the case of those offenders who are condemned to death by stoning. There is no explanation for the abandonment of the flogging element other than that the penalty all now acknowledge is based on the Sunna, i.e. the practice of the Prophet.

In all, 564 verses were alleged to have been expunged from the mushaf, or 1/11th of its total content   

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naskh_(tafsir)

Shafi was a liar and a hypocrite just like his student Nawawiy. They did abrogate the Quran and they know that.