Quote from: Bajram Hoxhaj on September 11, 2024, 03:48:32 PMSalam,
That's one of the dumbest things on the internet. He's braying with that clown in Arab garb to appeal to the ignorant.
48:29 Muhammad (who praise) messenger الله and the ones with him more vigorous of on (against) the disbelievers affectionate of between them thou see them kneel of prostrate of pursuing bounty of from الله and approval of marks theirs in faces theirs from the effect the prostration such similitude them in the Torah and similitude them in the Injeel[/colour] ... (i.e., the gospel according to Jesus—not Mark, Matthew, Luke, John, et al.)
The Qur'an was transmitted orally by millions from the time of revelation until today whereas old manuscripts (used as memory aids) appeared years later and were sent to the main provinces along with a 'reciter,' as I have already shown some with 'markings' below.
وَمَا مُحَمَّدٌ إِلَّا رَسُولٌ 3:144
and not Muhammad (whom praise) except messenger
See the 8th line from the bottom "Emanet 13" estimated date: 650 - 750
https://corpuscoranicum.de/en/manuscripts/59/page/24v?sura=3&verse=144
For better study suggest videos by Rabbi Tovia Singer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVUheV-Gw7w
Likewise, videos by professor Gabriel Said Reynolds
https://www.youtube.com/@ExploringtheQuranandtheBible
Salam bro,
I know Rabbi Tovia singer and Gabriel Reynolds.
He attacks cheery picks what he wants, and I don't remember which video he cited, Patricia Clon,e, doubting the historicity of Muhammad and using her as a scholar. But what he does not tell his audience is that Patricia Crone changed her views later and admitted Muhammad did exist
Patricia Crone "In the case of Mohammed, Muslim literary sources for his life only begin around 750-800 CE (common era), some four to five generations after his death, and few Islamicists (specialists in the history and study of Islam) these days assume them to be straightforward historical accounts. For all that, we probably know more about Mohammed than we do about Jesus (let alone Moses or the Buddha), and we certainly have the potential to know a great deal more.
There is no doubt that Mohammed existed, occasional attempts to deny it notwithstanding. His neighbours in Byzantine Syria got to hear of him within two years of his death at the latest; a Greek text written during the Arab invasion of Syria between 632 and 634 mentions that "a false prophet has appeared among the Saracens" and dismisses him as an impostor on the ground that prophets do not come "with sword and chariot". It thus conveys the impression that he was leading the invasions"
He attacks the historicity of Muhammad forgetting many Christian scholars attack the historicity of Jesus and the Bible as a whole
But I would be happy if our brothers in this forum took the time to refute him in his channel comment section or even have a YouTube debate.
God bless all
