I ran the thoughts and discussion 2nd part through chatgpt to summarize it:
The term "kitab" in the Quran is more accurately understood as "authoritative instruction" rather than a mere "book." It can refer to decrees or writs, indicating God's written commands or guidance, distinct from human writing. This revelation includes divine law and other essential knowledge, not limited to scripture, but encompassing all forms of guidance from God, including natural laws.
"Al Kitab" (the complete revelation) is in God's realm, while "al Quran" refers to the accessible form of revelation for humans. The term "dhalika/that" indicates something distant, while "hadha/this" denotes something closer, helping to distinguish between divine guidance and its earthly manifestation.
The phrase "people of the kitab" refers to those who have received divine revelation, contrasted with the "ummiyeen," who were unfamiliar with it. This distinction emphasizes the need for familiarity with divine instruction, not just being a recipient.
"Hikma" generally means wisdom, the ability to make sound decisions, and is often tied to God's revelation. While "hikma" can be found in various sources, it is a part of divine guidance, granting insight into how to apply teachings in life. Traditional interpretations sometimes separate "hikma" from the Quran, but the Quran itself emphasizes its role as a guiding principle within the revelation.
Thus, "al kitab wa al hikma" refers to the combination of divine guidance (kitab) and the wisdom to understand and apply it (hikma). This broader interpretation challenges the idea that "hikma" is external to the Quran, highlighting its integral role in interpreting God's message.
The evolution of reliance on hadith (traditions of the Prophet) in Islamic history illustrates the ongoing process of interpreting and applying divine guidance. However, the Quran advises that differences in understanding can be seen as a test, urging believers to strive for goodness and wisdom in their actions.