Quote from: good logic on November 19, 2019, 08:53:42 AM
Peace jafar.
When you say, quote:
I found the 'myth' of God asking questions to His own creation to be ridiculous... such view only valid if one took the assumption that God = Human / Creature who has limited access to information, thus validate the need to ask 'questions' to gather information.
It does not matter who does the questioning , but the questioning must be done Why?
Must be done?

?
I think we've went through with this many times..
Walt Disney asking Pete... Pete! Why did you kidnapped Minnie Mouse?
"Walt Disney asking Mickey to return to his cartoon, but Mickey refused".QuoteAccountability / "Amana" /Being responsible will lead to questioning to make things transparent.
In short questions like Why did you do such...? How come you did such...? Did you ignore/choose such....? have to be asked either by GOD or by the creation itself. At the end judgement has to be seen as transparent and fair.
It only valid within a 'mind context' where one see God as if it's a human, in this case a human judge asking a suspect why did you do this? why did you do that? within a human court.
Quote" GOD knows everything" is another matter. The process of judgement contains questioning regardless.
Your God seem to be a very 'judgmental' God.
Perhaps it's either caused by your own nature to be judgmental to others?? Thus it's being reflected back to you?
Let's assume that God is judgmental as you perceived Him to be.
God knows everything is NOT another matter.
Because the principles of accountability lies within those who are involved and have a degree of impact for certain outcome.
The accountability for the outcome of the death of a person within an embassy situated in a foreign country lies on, ordered by the degree of accountability from most accountable to less accountable:
1. The actual murderer who performed the murder.
2. The accomplishes who help the murderer
3. The ambassador who allow such deed to be performed within his jurisdiction of embassy.
4. The parties who directly ordered the murder to be performed.
5. The authority who indirectly ordered the murder to be performed.
6. Any other parties
who knows about the plan of the murder but didn't do anything to stop it.
7. Any other parties
who knows about the plan of the murder and do something about it but failed to stop it.
8. The security officials who has the responsibility to maintain law and order within the country where the murder is being performed.