Peace Jafar.
Studying a book so one is not making assumptions about it or relying on what others make of it is all I am asking you to do with Qoran. If you want.
Your choice.
If you are receiving revelations not to do that that is fine by me also.
GOD bless you.
Peace.
Peace, goodlogic; there is a fallacy behind your proposition to study the Qur'an, deeper and objectively to understand its meaning. This is the ambiguity fallacy.
What in the world is "study the Qur'an deeper & objectively"? Every Muslim theologian in history, all the muftis in Saudi Arabia, or ayatollahs of Iran, or talibans of Pakistan/Afghanistan claimed to "study the Qur'an both deeply and objectively".
The truth is, the Qur'an was sent to lay and illiterate Arabs. When the Qur'an was recited to them, it was clear enough they understood what it meant. They didn't study the Qur'an, they listened to it. Repeatedly, the Qur'an insist on its clarity. It shouldn't be rocket science.
Lastly, I'd like to touch on huruf and co.'s assertion that the "Qur'an is perfect but it is our interpretation that is imperfect."
Look, how do we know Qur'an is perfect if our interpretation of Qur'an is not perfect? You can't conclude some thing is perfect unless you reach the perfect interpretation of it.
Another truth, the only reason why we tend to downplay concerns about flaws of the Qur'an is because we believe it is the book of God, and as such we're biased in its favor. If the Qur'an is believed to be the book of man like the US constitution or Sumerian literature, none would dismiss concerns of its flaws so confidently.