Polycentric Community.
Community cannot be created by a group of strangers. By its very nature community demands 'common unity'. The modern industrialised world has just the fiction of community; community today maintains little meaning or connection to reality.
6:116 (People will confront you with what the majority is doing.) Now if you pay heed to, or get intimidated by majority of those who live on earth, they will lead you astray from Allah's (the One who is not a deity for worship and adoration) way. Most of the people follow nothing but conjecture and they only live by guesswork.(QXP)
Throughout a great portion of recorded history, humanity has suffered under a system of isolation, wherein the individual perceives himself to wield little or no power. The state and religions control and dictate to them and the general population through the mandates of carefully maintained family bloodlines, from Popes to Presidents, Monarchs to the Banking elite, all function under the same organisational sovereign model.
All religion utterly reject methodology in favour of dogmatic conclusion, none religious Islam rejects all religions in favour of methodology.
What do I mean by methodology?
Investigating the practical evidence of an action, in relationship to its out come.
As an example, the 'ritual' of prayer would be a religious way to supplicate a God in the sky, but practically the result is inaction, the deferment of responsibility, a draining of all enthusiasm and impetus to physically act in service, demonstrating a rejection of methodology in favour of dogma.
There are many forms of religion beyond the worship of a God in the sky, people worship money, power, celebrity etc., worshiping through obsessive attainment or living vicariously through the adoration of its dominant figures.
Why; no matter how much intelligent goodwill pours endlessly from the media in support of the dictates of the elite, is there so much war, suffering, injustice, hatred, poverty and depravity?
It doesn't matter what creative plan, ideology, religion, or philosophy great minds come up with, nothing changes for the better without enormous effort, yet society detrimentally changes for the worse whenever opportunity presents itself. Since the dawn of civilization, this pattern repeats over and over again.
Powerful family bloodlines control the modern world as they have done for many thousands of years in various regions of the earth, which is well documented; among them great care has been taken to interbreed only within these bloodlines, one of the easiest to examine is the Merovingian which later branched off into the Plantagenet. Consider in the brief historical descriptions listed below of these individuals, their behaviour through history as the reasons for these actions are explained further on.
Bloodlines
The Merovingians were a Salian Frankish dynasty from the middle of the 5th century. Their politics involved frequent warfare among the divided neighbouring communities subjugated by combative branches of the family. The Merovingian rule was ended March 752 when Pope Zachary formally deposed Childeric III. Zachary's successor, Pope Stephen II, re-confirmed and crowned Pepin the Short (714 - 768) in Childeric's place in 754, his son:
Charlemagne (pronounced /jarlamein)(742 - 814) Made Emperor by the Pope.
Louis (778 - 840) was the only surviving adult son of Charlemagne, whose offspring:
Lothair (795?855), king of Middle Francia
Pepin (797?838), king of Aquitaine
Louis the German (c. 805?875), king of East Francia
Charles the Bald, king of West Francia:
Louis the Stammerer (1 November 846 ? 879)
Charles III (17 September 879 ?929) loses Normandy in battle to:
Rollo (c. 870 ? c. 932)
William I Longsword (893 ? 942)
Richard I of Normandy (933 - 996) He introduced the feudal system and Normandy establishing the most feudalized state in the world.
Richard II (970 - 1026)
Richard III (997?1027)
Robert the Devil (1000 ? 1035)
William the Bastard (1028 ? 1087) (Blackmail by the Roman Catholic Church to subjugate Britain)
Henry I (1068/1069 ? 1135)
(William the Bastards daughter) Empress Matilda (1102 ? 1167) married:
Geoffrey Plantagenet
(House of Plantagenet)
Richard I (1157 ? 1199) Extremely close to the Knights Templar (the military arm of the Roman Catholic Church) as his brother John. He spent most of his reign on Crusade in the Holy Land indulging his love of bloody murder. He conquered Cyprus and twice almost took Jerusalem, he was pushed back by the Turks. While he was away, the King of France conspired with Richard's brother, John, to overthrow him. Their plans were boosted by the homeward bound King getting himself imprisoned in Germany by the Roman Catholic Church. Eventually, Richard did return home and John was defeated.
King John (1167 ? 1216) ?John was industrious and attentive to detail; he was often present in the law courts and at the exchequer. John, however, had none of Richard's excellence as a solider; and, more important, he was suspicious of all men, jealous of his Barons, devious in pursuing his objectives, and calculatingly cruel.Even the members of his own family were not safe. With good reason John was accused of arranging , in 1203, the murder of his nephew, Arthur Brittany, who might have inherited the throne of England by the strict rules of primogeniture.?(Ref: Origins of Common law by A A Hogue)
King Henry II(1133 ? 1189) Henry was the eldest son of the Empress Matilda and her second husband, Geoffrey of Anjou. As grandson of King Henry I, he helped his mother in her armed attempt to take the English throne from her cousin, Stephen. Matilda eventually withdrew, but Henry continued the fight and forced Stephen to accept him as his heir. He was quick to crack down on the Barons, improved his administration and the Exchequer and strengthened the law courts. His attempts to curb the power of the Church were met with opposition from the Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket, who was eventually murdered by Henry's well-meaning supporters. At the end of his reign, the King, unfortunately, faced an increasing number of rebellions from his many sons.
Henry III (1207 ? 1272)
Edward I Longshanks (1239 ? 1307) Edward claimed the right to choose a new King when little Queen Margaret died without an obvious heir. The Scots resisted and the English King instigated a full scale invasion. The Scottish leader, William Wallace, gained the upper hand for a while at the Battle of Sterling, but he was eventually captured and executed. Robert the Bruce (later King of Scots) then continued the fight. Edward's ruthless treatment of those north of the border, brought him the title, 'Hammer of the Scots'.
Edward II of Caernarfon (1284 ? 1327) The most overtly homosexual of all English monarchs, he quickly alienated the Barons by showering honours on his lovers. Troubles in Gascony led Edward to send his wife to negotiate with the French monarch. She persuaded Edward to send their son to her in France and then invaded England in open rebellion with her lover, Mortimer. They imprisoned the King in Berkeley Castle where he was eventually murdered in the most gruesome manner.
Edward III of Windsor (1312 ? 1377) Government was dominated by his mother and her lover, Mortimer, until the King was able to expel them at the age of seventeen. Like his predecessors, Edward continued to militarily interfere in Scottish politics; but he was really more interested in the Continent. Through his mother, he claimed to be heir to the French throne and so began the 'Hundred Years War'. Life throughout the country was devastated by the Black Death.
Richard II the Black Prince(1367 ? 1400) Aged only fourteen-and-a-half ruthlessly subdued the Peasants' Revolt in London, the worst insurrection of the lower classes that ever threatened society in England, he was ultimately murder by starvation at Pontefract Castle aged 33.
Henry IV of Bolingbroke ( 1366 ? 1413) After banishment from Richard he awaited his opportunity for revenge, ultimately orchestrating his predecessors death by starvation, to take the throne and embark on two so-called 'crusades' to the Eastern Baltic, on pretext of aiding the Teutonic Knights against the Lithuanians, satisfying his blood-lust.
Henry V (1387 ? 1422) He was a conqueror of men, imposing his subjugation upon all he conquered through force of arms.
Henry VI (1421 ? 1471)
Edward IV (1442 ? 1483)
Henry VI (1421 ? 1471)
Edward V (1470 ? 1483) Paternal uncle, Richard, Duke of Gloucester subverted this child's reign, by the execution of several members of the former clans. Gloucester brought his nephew Eward V to London and ominously assigned for him the Tower as his residence. He then summoned a Parliament by means of which he hoped to further his designs. Gloucester soon obtained custody of the little King's only brother, Richard, Duke of York, and sent him to keep his brother company in the Tower. He then cleared his way by executing Lord Hastings and deferring the Parliament. He trumped up a charge of bastardy against the two boys and, overawing the capital by bodies of his own adherents, proceeded to claim the Crown as King Richard III. The two princes were murdered shortly afterwards.
Richard III (1452 ? 1485)
Henry VII (1457 ? 1509) Born at Pembroke Castle when his mother was only thirteen.
Henry VIII (1491 ? 1547) At thirteen he was given dispensation from the Pope to enable him to marry his brother's widow, Catherine of Aragon. He was a cruel man who rejoiced in spilling the blood of his enemies. He was wickedly and often uselessly extravagant. And he made all this appear worse in the eyes of posterity by his ostentatious assumption of righteousness.
Edward VI (1537 ? 1553)
Mary Stuart (1542 ? 1587) Father Henry VIII
(House of Stuart) While still being the same bloodline.
King James I (1566 ? 1625), Sponsor of the King James version of the Bible
Charles I Stuart (1600 ? 1649)
Charles II (1630 ? 1685) After the Roman Catholic Churchs many attempts to subvert his authority had failed, like the gun powder plot, he was murdered through the orchestration of a civil war that resulted in what they desired, the charter for the bank of England, which the Stuart line had refused to allow for generations; but established immediately the Prince of Orange was installed.
Mary II Stuart (1662 ? 1694) (daughter of James II (1633 ? 1701)) was the wife to the homosexual William III, Prince of Orange (1650 ? 1702)
Anne (1665 ? 1714) married Prince George (1653 ? 1708) of Denmark
(House of Hanover) While still being the same bloodline.
King George I (1660 ? 1727)
George II (1683 ? 1760)
George III (1738 ? 1820)
George IV (1762 ? 1830)
William IV (1765 ? 1837)
Victoria (1819 ? 1901) Married:
Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (1819 ? 1861)
(House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha) While still being the same bloodline.
so the bloodline continued until the present day Elizabeth II
It is alleged every US Presidents, except Martin van Buren, can all be traced to ancestors named in the charts, through strands of the same House of Plantagenet bloodline; 33 of them can be traced directly back to King Henry II of England, another Plantagenet, and all Presidents, again with the exception of Martin van Buren, can be traced as cousins to one another.
It seems there are just 13 controlling bloodlines all interconnected and interbreeding dominating the world today, sitting in power, religionistic sovereigns, monarchistic sovereigns, capitalistic sovereigns, politicalistic sovereigns, every avenue of control.
If we go back to the 13th century it is well documented: ?The upper clergy, bishops and abbots, were often chosen from and lived like the military aristocracy, while the parish priest was usually closer to the cultivators of his manorial village. Bishops and Abbots were also Barons, maintaining large households,? (Ref- Origins of common law by Authur R Hogue p.111)
At some levels these subjugators are at war with one and other, just as they were when identified as the Merovingians, an unrelenting trait evident throughout their long history within Europe, and eventually within the entire earth, so today we suffer these parasites and villeins.
"The money power preys upon the nation in time of peace and conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me, and causes me to tremble for the safety of our country. Corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people, until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands, and the republic is destroyed." Abraham Lincoln
Abraham Lincoln exposes the greater dangers of the sovereign bankers upon the population, in defense of the subjugation he inflicted upon them through the fraud of sovereign government and the lie of democracy, however without the support of the sovereign governmental model no hidden sovereign could rule through debt, this exposure to the light of public attention ultimately resulted in his murder.
?You are a den of vipers. I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning.? 1835, President Andrew Jackson, there followed an (unsuccessful) assassination attempt on President Jackson's life.
All sovereign based civilizations, our own included, have been built on slavery and mass murder, if you investigate the history of Albion before it was subjugated, and renamed England, transformed into a sovereign based society from 1066 ( see: Rex Offa of Mercia ) , you will understand how these bloodlines manufactured a right to subjugate the people, through the forging of documents and indoctrination of fabricated history.
So what is so different about the members of these bloodlines?
There is a genetic inherited trait they all suffer, a trait you may mistakenly think is generated from the environment, no; this genetic abnormality is the reason and need for the close control and protection of these bloodlines. It also is demonstrated in the reverence they afford one-another, where they happily butcher half the population but often protect the sovereigns even in defeat.
The inventor of sovereign based civilization, the first to establish themselves as a sovereign tribal chieftain, who successfully brainwashed, or intimidated an army of subjugated and conditioned mass murderers, was almost certainly a genetic psychopath. Since that momentous discovery, psychopaths have enjoyed a significant advantage over non-psychopaths in the struggle for power in all sovereign based hierarchies.
?Psychopaths have played a disproportionate role in the development of civilization, because they are hard-wired to lie, kill, cheat, steal, torture, manipulate, and generally inflict great suffering on other humans without feeling any remorse, in order to establish their own sense of security through domination.
When you understand the true nature of psychopathic influence, that it is conscienceless, emotionless, selfish, cold and calculating, and devoid of any moral or ethical standards, you are horrified, but at the same time everything suddenly begins to makes sense. Our society is ever more soulless because the people who lead it and who set the example are soulless - they literally have no conscience.? (Ref - Political Ponerology: A science on the nature of evil adjusted for political purposes, by Andrzej Lobaczewski.)
These individuals do not want you to connect the dots, in this endeavor they have gone to extreme lengths, even removing words from common use, if you ask anyone in the general population if they have heard of conceptual words like; usury, or allodial, they will look at you blankly, they have begun the process in 1980 of removing the word psychopath, even redefining it as a minor condition, 'antisocial personality disorder' or misdiagnosed as 'sociopath', there is neither a cure nor any effective treatment for psychopathy, a neurological disorder which is biological in origin and present from birth, it affects only 0.6% of the population, and is past through at the genetic level, inherited from parents suffering the same affliction, passing on the abnormality.
This is not a psychosis, being a loss of contact with reality, they do not hallucinate and do not suffer from delusions in general, it is a physical abnormality, present from birth to death, they have no conscience, or empathy so feel no guilt or remorse.
Within nature simple underlying structures exist, like dichotomy, being for example positive and negative, or black and white. This structure also demonstrates a differential fractal organisation, which means these simple underlying structures have a common ratio of difference of 99.something percent. For example 99.9% of all solid mass is crystalline, or 99.9% of the universe is plasma, this follows through for psychopaths, the family of Adam representing 99.4% of humanity, the percentage of psychopaths is greater than it would be naturally due to the careful control of the bloodlines.
The Qur'an explains this through the use of the word 'hidden', in Arabic 'Jinn' The root-verb is janna, ?he concealed? or ?covered with darkness?
?And when We said to the Angels: Make submission to Adam, they submitted except Iblis. He was of the Jinn, so he transgressed the Commandment of his Lord. Will you then take him and his offspring for friends rather then Me. And they are your enemies? Evil is the exchange for the unjust.? (18:50)
The waking mind is Iblis, and Jinn are just the waking mind, without a subconscious (soul), they rule the family of Adam with contempt for their ignorance.
?And we did certainly create man out of clay from an altered black mud.
And the concealed covered in darkness We created long before that, from the essential fire.? (15:26,27)
So clay is a metaphor for something created with substance so something eternal, fire is a metaphor for something brief and fleeting.
So if we consider the family of Adam, the first man to acquire a soul, he had offspring, who mated with the soulless Jinn, their offspring were of the family of Adam, this highlights the need for the remaining Jinn to closely control the bloodlines of these remaining families.
The corporate business practices establish parallels, between corporate legal misbehavior (malfeasance) and the DSM-IV's symptoms of psychopathy, i.e. callous disregard for the feelings of other people, the incapacity to maintain human relationships, reckless disregard for the safety of others, deceitfulness (continual lying to deceive for profit), the incapacity to experience guilt, and the failure to conform to social norms and respect for the law. Governments are corporations, founded as such, all sovereign government is incorporated to its originator, the Roman Catholic corporation.
Nature verses nurture
Research suggests that, ?psychopaths are a stable proportion of any population, can be from any segment of society, may constitute a distinct taxonomical class forged by frequency-dependent natural selection, and that the muting of the social emotions is the proximate mechanism that enables psychopaths to pursue their self-centered goals without felling the pangs of guilt. Sociopaths are more the products of adverse environmental experiences that affect autonomic nervous system and neurological development that may lead to physiological responses similar to those of psychopaths. Antisocial personality disorder is a legal/clinical label that may be applied to both psychopaths and sociopaths? (Walsh & Wu, 2008).
The PCL-R identifies interpersonal deficits (such as grandiosity, arrogance and deceitfulness), affective deficits (lack of guilt and empathy), and impulsive and criminal behaviors (sexual promiscuity, stealing, etc.) that are typical deficits of the psychopath. In his book, Without Conscience, Hare stated that the difference between psychopathy and sociopathy ?reflects on the origins and determinates of each.?
There is a very good analogy in fiction to the two conditions, the psychopath verses the sociopath, that of the vampire:
A born vampire makes humans into vampires, and the human vampires can make other humans into vampires. The born vampire is much more powerful and so evil than a made vampire, the born vampire is the count or royalty, who has the wealth and power to protect the made vampires and if the born vampire is destroyed the human vampires are destroyed with him.
Sociopathy vs. Psychopathy
By Kelly McAleer, Psy.D.
Differences between psychopathy and sociopathy, aside from origin, have been cited. The capacity to feel attachment and empathy towards another and to feel guilt and shame after doing something wrong is not associated with psychopathy; however it is suggested that sociopaths can emotionally attach to others, and feel badly when they hurt those individuals that they are attached to. The sociopath will still lack empathy and attachment toward the greater society and will not feel guilt in harming a stranger, or rebelling against laws, but does not lack empathy entirely, as is typical with the psychopath.
Therefore, both psychopaths and sociopaths are capable of committing heinous crimes; however, the psychopath would commit crimes against family members or ?friends? (as well as strangers) and feel little to no remorse.
The last main difference between psychopathy and sociopathy is in the presentation. The psychopath is callous, yet charming. He or she will con and manipulate others with charisma and intimidation and can effectively mimic feelings to present as ?normal? to society. The psychopath is organized in their criminal thinking and behavior, and can maintain good emotional and physical control, displaying little to no emotional or autonomic arousal, even under situations that most would find threatening or horrifying. The psychopath is keenly aware that what he or she is doing is wrong, but does not care.
Conversely, the sociopath is less organized in his or her demeanor; he or she might be nervous, easily agitated, and quick to display anger. A sociopath is more likely to spontaneously act out in inappropriate ways without thinking through the consequences. Compared to the psychopath, the sociopath will not be able to move through society committing callous crimes as easily, as they can form attachments and often have ?normal temperaments.? The sociopath will lie, manipulate and hurt others, just as the psychopath would, but will often avoid doing so to the select few people they care about, and will likely feel guilty should they end up hurting someone they care about.
So, while these two terms seem interchangeable on the surface because they share many of the same characteristics, they are more like two sides of the same coin. Looking at the differences may seem futile; however, looking at psychopathy and sociopathy as different constructs may prove to be helpful in understanding the etiology of these disorders, and in the development of effective treatment methods.
References
Hare, R.D. (1993). Without conscience: The disturbing world of psychopaths among us. New York: Pocket Books.
Stout, M. (2005). The sociopath next door: The ruthless versus the rest of us. New York: Broadway Books.
Walsh, A., & Wu, H.H. (2008). Differentiating antisocial personality disorder, psychopathy, and sociopathy: Evolutionary, genetic, neurological, and sociological considerations. Criminal Justice Studies, 2, 135-152.
American Liberation
Like the city state of London and the Vatican, a third city state was officially created in 1790 as Act One of the Constitution of America. That city state is called the District of Columbia and located on ten square miles of land in the heart of Washington. The District of Columbia flies its own flag, and has its own independent constitution. Although geographically separate, the city states of London, the Vatican, and the District of Columbia are one interlocking empire called Empire of the City.
The flag of Washington?s District of Columbia has three red stars. One for each city state in the three city empire. This corporate empire of three city states controls the world economically through London?s inner city, militarily through the District of Columbia, and spiritually through the Vatican.
The constitution for the District of Columbia operates under a tyrannical Roman law known as Lex Fori which bares no resemblance to the US Constitution.
When Congress passed the Act of 1871 it created a separate corporate government for the District of Columbia. This treasonous act allowed the District of Columbia to operate as a corporation outside the original constitution of the United States and outside of the best interest of American citizens.
A sobering study of the signed treaties and charters between Britain and the United States exposes a shocking truth that the United States has always been and still is a British Colony. King James I was famous, not for just changing the Bible into the King James version, but for signing the First Charter of Virginia in 1606. That charter granted America?s British forefathers a license to settle and colonize America. The charter also guarantees that future kings and queens of England would have sovereign authority over all the citizens and colonized land in America stolen from the Indians.
Although King George III of England gave up most of his claims over the American colonies, he kept his right to continue receiving payment for his business venture of colonizing America. If America had really won the war of independence they would never have agreed to pay debts and reparations to the King of England.
Americas blood soaked war of independence against the British bankrupted America and turned its citizens into permanent debt slaves of the king. In the War of 1812 the British torched and burned to the ground the White House and all US government buildings and destroyed ratification records of the US Constitution.
In 1604, a corporation called the Virginia Company was formed in anticipation of the imminent influx of white Europeans, mostly British at first, into the North American continent. Its main stockholder was King James I and the original charter for the company was completed by April 10th 1606.
The Virginia Company owned most of the land of what we now call the USA. The Virginia Company (The British Crown and the bloodline families) had rights to 50%, yes 50%, of all gold and silver mined on its lands, plus percentages of other minerals and raw materials, and 5% of all profits from other ventures. The lands of the Virginia Company were granted to the colonies under a Deed of Trust (on lease) and therefore they could not claim ownership of the land. They could pass on the perpetual use of the land to their heirs or sell the perpetual use, but they could never own it. Ownership was retained by the British Crown.
The original Organic American Constitution reads: ?The Constitution for the united states of America?.
The altered version reads: ?THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?.
When Americans agree to have a social security number the citizens of the united states surrender their sovereignty and agree to become franchises of the United States (The Virginia Company of the British Crown). (see: The Vatican)
The "Founding Fathers" deceived the colonists, and lead them into a war against their own freedoms (limited as they were). They, the founding fathers, being Freemasons or being members of the Bar (British Accreditation of Regency: which means, to officially recognize a person or organization as having met a standard or criterion as a person or group of people ruling on behalf of a monarch (representative of the Pope) who is unable to rule because of youth, illness, or absence, in person.), lawyers, trained and educated by the Roman Catholic legal structure, are trained advocates of corporate sovereignty. (see: The Law of Men (The First Crusade))
The framers of the 'imanimous Declaration':
Benjamin Franklin (1785 - 1788) freemason, serving as Grand Master of the Lodge Les Neuf S?urs from 1779 until 1781. His number was 24 in the Lodge.
George Washington (1789 - 1797) Freemason. (house of plantagenet (HP))
John Adams (1797 - 1801) A lawyer in Worcester. In 1758, Adams was admitted to the bar (HP)
Thomas Jefferson (1743 - 1826) was admitted to the Virginia bar in 1767.(HP)
John Jay (1745 - 1829) In 1768, admitted to the bar of New York
James Madison (1751 - 1836) worked in and studied law sporadically but never gained admission to the bar (HP)
Alexander Hamilton (1755 - 1804) in July 1783 was admitted to the New York Bar
In Congress, July 4, 1776
The imanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
?When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
(So exchange one slave master for another)
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.(Governments are instituted against Men, to subjugate and exploit, freedom is not a personal choice, you can not be endowed with rights to be free, freedom is environmental not personal, you must live in a societal structure free from the compulsion of others against your personal choice bound to common law) That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are suffer-able, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. (The ground is laid plain, government will enslave you, they install your destruction and call it emancipation)
Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world. (So government is slavery and they again expose this truth only to wish to install their own adaptation.)
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
(Sovereigns refuse to accept or follow common law, or even adhere to their own invented legislation if it runs against their objectives)
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
(Legislation is not required, just common law, but to lawyers who function solely on legislated law and avoid common law it is inconceivable)
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
(The instilling of fear to allow the societal freedoms to be removed, to justify the enslavement to sovereign government)
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
(So they impose their fiction upon those wishing to live within their sphere of subjugation, stating their right to catalogue)
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
(They function upon the sovereign legal structure, as all Roman Catholic models are founded on the pyramid of power, making the victim powerless and crime administration a lucrative business)
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
(something the American government have established across the earth, with troops stationed in every corner of the world)
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
(again just as the American government do)
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
(Just as the American government do, inflicting constrictions and conditions to trade to exploit and defraud those weaker)
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
(Just as the sovereign American government do)
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
(A trial by Jury is not much use if the common law is ignored in favour of legislation)
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
(Just as the American government do)
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
(Who gave the right for any man to legislate upon another, only through fictions can these systems exist)
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
(Just as the American government has done)
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. (again they use sophistry to exchange one slave master for another) We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States;(by the creation of a state you break common law, and install a fiction of sovereignty) that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.?
The Signers:
John Hancock: a member of the Masonic Lodge of St. Andrew from 1762
Josiah Bartlett: Protestant Christian
William Whipple, Jr.: Judge
Matthew Thornton:
Samuel Adams: Protestant Christian
John Adams: admitted to the bar 1758
Robert Treat Paine: admitted to the bar in 1757
Elbridge Thomas Gerry: Episcopal Church member "Protestant, yet Catholic"
Stephen Hopkins
William Ellery: admitted to the Bar in 1754
Samuel Huntington: admitted to the bar in 1754
William Williams: Protestant Christian Deacon
Oliver Wolcott:
William Floyd: second cousin twice removed was Abraham Lincoln
Philip Livingston: a Mason
Francis Lewis: A Masonic Lodge named in his honour, Francis Lewis #273, is also located in Whitestone, NY
Lewis Morris
Richard Stockton: admitted to the bar in 1754
John Witherspoon: Presbyterian clergyman, professor of divinity
Francis Hopkinson: admitted to the bar 1775
John Hart: Presybterian, Judge
Abraham Clark: lawyer
Robert Morris, Jr.: Episcopal Church member "Protestant, yet Catholic"
Benjamin Rush: campaigned for the removal of Gen. George Washington
Benjamin Franklin: Freemason, serving as Grand Master of the Lodge Les Neuf S?urs from 1779 until 1781
John Morton: justice of the peace
George Clymer:
James Smith: admitted to the bar in Pennsylvania
George Taylor: Protestant Christian, justice of the peace
James Wilson: admitted to the bar in 1767
George Ross: admitted to the bar in Philadelphia
George Read: admitted to the Bar in 1753
Caesar Rodney: lawyer, judge
Thomas McKean: admitted to the Bar in 1755
Samuel Chase: admitted to the bar in 1761
William Paca: admitted to the bar in 1764
Thomas Stone: admitted to the bar in 1764
Charles Carroll of Carrollton: Roman Catholic Jesuit
George Wythe: lawyer, judge, law professor
Richard Henry Lee: lawyer, justice of the peace
Thomas Jefferson: admitted to the bar in 1767
Benjamin Harrison V:
Thomas Nelson, Jr.
Francis Lightfoot Lee
Carter Braxton
William Hooper: admitted to the bar 1764
Joseph Hewes: Mason member of Unanimity Lodge No. 7, visited in 1776, and was buried with Masonic funeral honors
John Penn: became a lawyer in Virginia in 1762
Edward Rutledge: admitted to the English bar (Middle Temple)
Thomas Heyward, Jr.: studied law at the Middle Temple (serve as a judge)
Thomas Lynch, Jr.: studied law at the Middle Temple
Arthur Middleton: studied law at the Middle Temple
Button Gwinnett
Lyman Hall: clergyman
George Walton: Freemason and member of Solomon's Lodge No. 1, F. & A. M. at Savannah.
At least 29 are trained in Roman Legislated law of the 56 signatures.
The sovereign system could be viewed as a scalar network, each individual has a minimum value, and this value cannot change, no matter the actions of the individual in the view of the governing system; it demonstrates an expansion of population within an isolated minimum value.
The subjugated minds of the population are easily pacified with illusions of equality, illusions of opportunity, illusions of identity, and illusions of ownership through taxation, just as religion pacifies them with illusions of salvation, illusions of resolution, illusions of justice and illusions of sanctity.
This results in a system that has no true value for the individual, it values property, wealth, and land as having a higher value than human life, the most extreme example of this dehumanization of the individual, would be manifest through the communist model, where the state has total power, dominating each individual.
Within the polycentric community model: government, usury, legislation, sovereignty, corporations, states, and political power are not required.
'The threat of overwhelming force against the legally disarmed.'
In contrast to this the Islamic structure could be viewed as a non-scalar network. Within this social structure the individual is viewed as all powerful, so in the control of their own actions and desires, each individual can increase their perceived value, and no governing system can control and dictate upon them beyond common law, also known as universal law (not legislation).
This results in a system that has no true value for property, wealth or land, but an exceedingly high value for a human life, human health, human comfort, human development, human advancement and the fulfilling of each individuals full potential. The limiting factors upon the individual is within the dynamics of the local community they exist within, for example if only a single isolated community existed, surround by a corporate model social structure and usury economics (riba), sustained through sovereignty based thinking, the opportunities for the individual would be limited, but the greater the number of communities, the more opportunity would be opened. As a non-scalar community, no outside government could be in control of the community, as it is self governing, self sustaining at a basic level, it generates its own wealth and exists symbiotically with the communities around it, interacting in every facet of life, and ultimately it would be self replicating.
This results in a system that has no true value for property, wealth or land, but an exceedingly high value for a human life, human health, human comfort, human development, human advancement and the fulfilling of each individuals full potential. The limiting factors upon the individual is within the dynamics of the local community they exist within, for example if only a single isolated community existed, surround by a corporate model social structure and usury economics (riba), sustained through sovereignty based thinking, the opportunities for the individual would be limited, but the greater the number of communities, the more opportunity would be opened. As a non-scalar community, no outside government could be in control of the community, as it is self governing, self sustaining at a basic level, it generates its own wealth and exists symbiotically with the communities around it, interacting in every facet of life, and ultimately it would be self replicating.
A centralised regional 'Hub', comprising of many self governing communities circling it, 'Nodes', would form a regional market, and allow regional community debate, and so the exchange of ideas in the development and improvements of the area. In this way each community would have easy and natural access to more than one hub.Replication of nodes would be a natural expansion of the model, as the community grew larger, land allocation would set people further afield, so making them in effect a new node, which in turn would build out into a new hub. This also allows for natural diversity, as upon the basic foundations of the contract an infinite number of possible environments could be established. Within any community there is of course no compulsion to stay, any member can leave or new members join as they wished.
All individuals making up the community would be held within a signed social contract, as established within common law, a constitution of minimum standards, these preventing the reintroduction of enslaving systems, this means individuals would consider the social contract, and at an age of maturity and mental competence, upon agreement, invest themselves to that social model, with signed witnesses, this would make them bond to follow the minimum boundaries of that society, upon a foundation of common law, defining the Islamic model as a contract would then be a vital aspect to begin any Islamic community.
This fundamental concept is explained within the essay 'Common Law', as you are within this sovereign based corporate society, signed in under contract through your birth certificate by your parents, you must first dissolve the contract to that society before establishing your new contract with the Islamic society.
In the recent past and at present, large and small communities are socially structured through a Jewish/Christian sovereign model, this leads to sovereign tribal wars, and the pyramid of sovereign extraction, draining the labour of the poor towards the elite. However within the Islamic model, no sovereign can exist, as only Allah can be sovereign, noting that not even the messenger Muhammad can be your sovereign, so rendering Hadith worthless. This restriction on the establishment of sovereigns, means no sovereign can dominate and bully their subjected people into the theft of the property of their neighbours, or the murder, genocide, enslavement or subjugation of their neighbours.
Personal Freedoms.
The serpent that seduces perception is the Sophist ? meaning, 'One skilled in elaborate and devious argumentation'. Sophist arguments confuse perception and action, but are often difficult to identify. Politicians, barristers, and media mouthpieces are simply professional sophists. Sophist try to argue freedom from the perspective of personal action, when freedom should be viewed in the opposite perspective, a society free from exploitation, free from subjugation, free from conflict, free from usury, free from taxation, free from religious compulsion, etc. this would be freedom, personal actions are dominated by personal responsibility, to be free is an environmental state more than a personal act.
The sophist shout about the gift of personal freedoms bestowed by sovereigns, that grant rights to the individuals they subjugate, with human rights acts, rights that are only required because of the environment the sophists establish for there sovereigns.
The sophists want the individual to consume, to maintain the force of debt, they argue thrift is the opposite of consumption, when thrift is the reduction of consumption to a minimal level, in reality the opposite of consumption is generosity, as consumption is for the self, generosity is for another.
Sophist confusions are replete in the modern world, confusing people in every avenue of life, without any public mechanism allowed to expose the sophist logic to the light of reason.The concept of personal freedom; no group can compel an individual to do anything against their will, the freedom of an individual to act as they see fit, if that action does not conflict with common law, action that harms no one else (physically, mentally or socially), that action cannot be disputed, freedom of expression, freedom of belief, freedom of diversity (cultural, social, personal).
The concept of free education; free of outside influence and manipulations, free of dogma, free of biased views and deceptive facts, a right to be educated to the height of each individual?s abilities, in intellectual or physical disciplines, as we have been created for knowledge.
What is freedom, but the ability to act freely: a state in which somebody is able to act, and live as they choose, without being subject to any undue restraints or restrictions. Being free is a responsibility, one that our forefathers failed to sustain, leaving us as economic slaves, restricted, conditioned and indoctrinated into a delusion of freedom, but a reality of conformity and constraint, continually escalating. The elite attempt to redefine the understanding of freedom, convincing you freedom is action free from responsibility, they endeavour to excuse consequence, defer accountability to a third party, in truth freedom is the opposite of this, freedom is responsibility, you are fully responsible for your actions, accountable for the results of your actions and cannot escape the ultimate consequence after a lifetime of personal choices. Freedom is making decisions under your own volition, not having to comply to the decisions of others, freedom is taking responsibility for your actions, not creating excuses to justify them, freedom is the power to control the fruits of your labour without the usurious dilution of your efforts, freedom is the right to feel safe, secure and confident within the community you live, freedom is the right to privacy for yourself and the people you interact with. Freedom is this and more; with true freedom you generate great responsibility, with indoctrinated social engineering you generate terrible slavery.
It cannot be a system of force but of choice, if people choose to live like swine, no amount of force will change that, it will only increase the depravity, freedom means responsibility, to live as a caliph of Allah?s guidance, is to live as a free, fearless, reasoning, lover of truth.
A Caliph.
Everyone of us is a potential caliph (potential only), meaning being a custodian of the Earth (because each generation succeeds the next, and so must leave the Earth in the same good condition they were given it, even improve its condition), meaning, they are responsible in conferring respect to the environment they exists within, as they are dependent upon this structure, capable of understanding the laws of nature, ultimately through this understand utilising them to their advantage, having them bow to their will; a servant of humanity, a protector of the innocent and vulnerable, a scholar and teacher, always honest by word and deed, selfless and generous; they are responsible to themselves and the people and animals around them, to demonstrate respect and concern for their welfare and edification.
Within the community at large each caliph is responsible for their own decisions, if they wish to establish 'Salat' (establishing through reason and investigation a Qur'anic purpose) these decisions are then generated through the comprehension and unbiased understanding of the concepts guided within the Qur?an, free of any 'Hadith' (being unmitigated conjecture). Or if a communal decision, through community discussion, and implemented through a committee selected with specific talents or knowledge for the task under question, if the group requires a voice among many communities for large regional decisions, the caliph sent is simply the orator of their decisions, they may be viewed simply as the mouthpiece that has inherited the message they express from the collective decision, which only morally binds those who accept any undertaking, while all decisions are accountable to common law.
It maybe said there is not enough land to apply this model, but if you look at land use in the UK, being a very densely populated land mass, the population only use 3% of the land area, the rest is held by the sovereigns, there truly is no shortage of land for community use anywhere on earth.
This structure of community is not democracy, for example, if there are 100 people and a park is suggested to the group, the idea is explained and a location suggested, the group firstly establish there is no conflict to the idea or location, the proponent of the idea then asks the 100 people who would like to contribute to the venture, only those individuals who wish to contribute, actually do contribute, no imposed burden is enforced upon the group at large.
Taxation.
To tax (from the Latin 'taxo' meaning 'I estimate') After introducing tax:
1. The price received by the seller is less than the cost to the buyer. This means that fewer trades occur and that the individuals or businesses involved gain less from participating in the market. This destroys value, and is known as the 'dead weight cost of taxation'.
2. Imposed overhead costs - accounts, records and receipts, internal and external accounting, invasive oversight of government, and the use of intimidation both financial and physical by the state, requiring administration and infrastructure costs, both personal and state (they pass the burden onto increased taxation).
3. Tax implemented by the bankers is a burden that increases, indirect and direct taxation is required to feed the loan repayments to the bankers, who print money for the cost of printing and lend it to the government at interest, halving the value of savings and doubling the cost of goods every ten years on average, modern taxation was introduced by the bankers simply to service loans, without the usury of the bankers taxation is not required.
4. Public services supplied in justification for the taxation reduce and degenerate the longer the system runs due to the ever increasing demands of the interest payments to the bankers for the fictitious loan repayments.
George Mason University, stated "Government income redistribution programs produce the same result as theft. In fact, that's what a thief does; he redistributes income. The difference between government and thievery is mostly a matter of legality."
Taxation is the ultimate form of usury or 'Riba', as it is termed in Arabic, as a determinate foundation absolutely no form of taxation can be inflicted upon the population. This cannot be stressed strongly enough, all and every tax is a crime against the individual, without exception, it is not required and works in a counterproductive way within society, it reduces services and increases costs, as is demonstrated historically.
Usury.
