My question (which may or may not be rhetorical) based on this thread is: If two pieces of "wisdom" contradict, which is the "most" wise?
Incase, I do not take it as rhetorical I would answer: Depends on the situation.
In which case, the counter question would be: How would I know the "wise path to take" if I can only know for sure in retrospect?
And so on.
It actually has stimulated some higher plane thinking I would say returning to my first question...If two wise sayings contradict, surely it is not universal wisdom?
Going back to the original post...is it morally alright to use means of deception in war? Interesting question that can be encountered in different situations inclusive of war. I would say, in case the gauntlet has been thrown...and as long as the war or whatever is only directed towards whom it should be directed against and who based on the announcement/commencement of hostilities (as said) should be prepared for everything, seems okay. Of course, then again to a purist it might be wrong on all counts as honesty would be the only policy. It would seem that winning by deception might be earnestly contested and looked down on for a long time and the winners might not have the higher moral ground in the eyes of people (other than the losers I mean as the losers can just be ignored by calling it sour grapes). Then again the foxes of the world would be proud. Who cares about the world though if we are talking what's morally right.
I'm off to build my Lego City now, then bring in a trojan horse and make those cute lil people run...