The same grammatical rules that I used to justify that Makkah is not a city in the Quran and that bakkah is not a city either, definitely allows that ramadaan is not the Arab month that we are all used to. It follows the same form as nasayaan and shana'aan(in th Quran) that implies an intensive or during action. So Ramadaan does means 'intense heat, or lasting heat' and 'shah-r' being a month or a period oof 30 days definitely allows us to interpret our fasting in the Quran to be during a month of intense or lasting heat, and it was such a month in which the Quran was revealed.
With that said, now comes the issue of the pilgrimage. Analyzes Ahillat is a broket plural which can be for alot of different forms 'fa'eel, fi'aal, etc'
I only have a couple examples in mind 'hilaal and wareedat'. With that said haleel could also be the singular of ahillat. Hilaal can also me the equavalent of muhaallat (form III). However, I have never seen the verbal noun of the 3rd form put into a broken plural. I have never seen any verbal nound put into a broken plural. So if anyone can find examples of this, as well as the evocative 'an' overpowering the possessive and propostion cases (jarr) I would appreciate that.
I will be able to give my arguments more backing and can open us up to the more realistic and universal application of the Quran. The next step is finding out which months should be the 4 months of pilgrimage, or if we are allowed to come to a consensus on them on our own.
Godbless,
Anwar