I haven't figured all of it as of yet, I never said I did. But my current knowledge surpasses commonly accepted superstitions, that's for sure. And I was alone throughout this journey, which confirms my stance on organized research and organized anything. And my studies and overall spiritual journey was fruitful. So unless you can explain me the basics as per my previous post, which I guess you can't, what is your overall knowledge of the Quran or any other spiritual book for that matter worth? And these were the basics, a tip of an eisberg, so to speak. But perhaps not a principle (foundation).
So I invite others to this journey and find out for themselves. As long as your worldview is confined by commonly accepted superstitions and limited discoveries you will not understand anything outside of ideas you previously accepted. There is no single authority which has a right to impose meanings, that's what I was/am trying to say. I only invite to look beyond found discoveries and look further. And I strongly advise to take a heed of a following apocryphal saying "Truth did not come into the world naked, but it came in types and images. The world will not receive truth in any other way".
And there is no such thing as hearsay, everything has a purpose. As such, if you do not understand the meaning behind kaaba circulation or the kaaba itself, which can only be acquired outside of the traditional understanding of the Quran, then that's the very evidence of ya'll being limited in thoughts and worldview. In fact, Quran alone is a very limited type of thinking to the point that to me it is sad and funny simultaneously.
There is also an incomplete New Age-inspired translation of the Qur'an available, written by a person with Messiah-complex, who also has a strange understanding of word "logic" and claims to exercise it to the highest extent, which itself is non-sense as it is easy to refute hundreds of his claims and see how limited he truely is, but nonetheless I recommend others to find and study his work, and see how biased and narrow it is. That being said, and it is a hint, the Qur'an does not require a "translation" as per common view, as its major words require separate chapters to explain and these will only and always be explained from the position of a psyche of the author of the translation. The psyche is a filter through which one understands the subjective and objective world around him.
