Messages

[24,892,608]

With up to six daughters, sons, sisters, and brothers and accounting for distinct cases of a wife or husband as spouses, the final total is 24,892,608 cases, and any sole heir always gets the whole, e.g., either parent, spouse, offspring/child (son or daughter), sibling (brother or sister), etc.

In "all cases," the shares equal 1, i.e., the whole, after wills, money owed, borrowed, etc., and are never above or below this amount. Examples include 1/3 to the mother (4:11), with 2/3 to the father as remainder; 1/3 to parents (4:11), 1/4 to the husband (4:12), 5/12 remainder to children, i.e., daughters and/or sons; 4:11 as a 2 females:1 male ratio; 3+ females:1 male; 1 female:1 male, since the girls are not alone فَوْقَ (fawqa), meaning "over" or "greater than" (>), two females, i.e., 3+ can never mean 2+; likewise, اِثْنَتَيْنِ (iṯnatayni), the feminine dual, means exactly two and never more.

‎"فللذكر مثل حظ الأنثيين" "So, to the male, an equal portion (fortune) to that of two females," 4:176, 4:11, where this distribution rule does not apply to a single female inheritor, as two females need to be present. Perhaps I'll write (inshallah) a detailed paper on Academia.edu, summarizing all 25+ million cases.

These adjustments maintain your wording while clarifying punctuation and minor structure.

You said:
super! thank you!

ChatGPT said:
You're very welcome! I'm glad I could help. If you have any more texts or questions, feel free to reach out. Best of luck with your research and future paper! 😊

It's getting really smart; kudos to Mira Murati former CTO of OpenAI.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/behind-the-tech/mira-murati-chief-technology-officer-openai

I believe it's got a bit of her personality. 😊

[It was narrated from 'Amir bin Sa'd that his father said:]

It's obvious that when there is only one sole heir—such as a husband, wife, mother, father, daughter(s), son(s), sister(s), or brother(s)—that heir or group inherits everything according to the Qur'an and the sound advice given in the hadith below.

https://sunnah.com/nasai:3626
It was narrated from 'Amir bin Sa'd that his father said:

"I became ill with a sickness from which I later recovered. The Messenger of Allah came to visit me, and I said: 'O Messenger of Allah, I have a great deal of wealth and I have no heir except my daughter. Shall I give two-thirds of my wealth in charity?' He said: 'No.' I said: 'Half?' He said: 'No.' I said: 'One-third?' He said: '(Give) one-third, and one-third is a lot. It is better to leave your heirs independent of means, than to leave them poor and holding out their hands to people.'"

Thus, two-thirds (2/3) of the remaining wealth—i.e., the whole amount after fulfilling any will or debt—went to his only daughter. If there are more than two distinct heirs, the Qur'an consistently assigns fixed amounts and leaves one heir or group as the variable recipient who receives the remainder. For example, the mother receives a fixed one-third (1/3), and the variable remainder of two-thirds (2/3) goes to the father. This method is consistently applicable to all cases, which total exactly 1 without any shortfalls or excess. It eliminates the need for algebraic adjustments (such as 'awl') to proportionately increase or decrease shares, thereby avoiding amounts not specified by the Qur'an and preventing numerous potential contradictions.

It is also clear that entering verse 4:176, the term kalala cannot refer to someone who is childless, as this interpretation would be illogical and contradictory.

1. Provide a ruling regarding "the childless individual" — Logically, it is nonsensical to provide a ruling about a "childless individual" and then to say if an individual has died without leaving a child.
2. Therefore, kalala can, in fact, refer to someone who has a child.

https://www.google.com/books/edition/Qur_anic_Term_Kalala/taQxEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1

An anonymous poet stated:
Surely, a father protects his offspring more fiercely,
‎ومولى الكلالة لا يغضب
while a patron (mawlá) l-kalālati does not gets angry.

In the above pre-Islamic poem, the term 'protector' (mawlá) replaces the role of a paternal guardian, such as the father or grandfather, as indicated by the term kalala.

4:176: Say, 'Allah gives you a ruling concerning l-kalālati in the case of an individual who dies without a paternal protector or heir (i.e., father/grandfather).' If he (individual) has no offspring heir..."

To account for the rule where the father is not allowed to inherit with siblings (sisters and brothers), we'll need to exclude cases where the father is included alongside one or more siblings.

If we extend the calculation to allow up to 6 daughters, sons, sisters, and brothers, the possible choices for each of these heir types will increase. Let's update the calculation accordingly.

Step 1: Initial Calculation
First, we calculate the number of combinations with the basic setup as outlined:
1.    Mother: 2 choices (included or not included)
2.    Father: 2 choices (included or not included)
3.    Daughters: 7 choices (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 daughters)
4.    Sons: 7 choices (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 sons)
5.    Spouse: 2 choices (either wife or husband, considered as distinct types)
6.    Sisters: 7 choices (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 sisters)
7.    Brothers: 7 choices (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 brothers)

So, the calculation for this setup would be:

2 × 2 × 7 × 7 × 2 × 7 × 7 = 19,2082

Step 2: Expanding for Distinctions
To account for the distinctions in each category of heir types with up to 6 children and siblings, we multiply by additional factors:
•    For daughters (up to 6 distinct): multiply by 6
•    For sons (up to 6 distinct): multiply by 6
•    For sisters (up to 6 distinct): multiply by 6
•    For brothers (up to 6 distinct): multiply by 6

Thus, we multiply the base total of 19,208 by these factors:

19,208 × 6 × 6 × 6 × 6 = 24,892,608

Final Total
With up to 6 daughters, sons, sisters, and brothers, and accounting for distinct cases of wife or husband as spouses, the final total is:

Total cases = 24,892,608

Here are only a few cases of the total to illustrate:

4:11 instructed you (pl.) Allah in offspring yours
to the male similar portion (fortune) the females two

(Note: The above requires minimum two females present)

2 daughters, 1+ sons (2.0x to males)

1/2 two daughters (1/4 each) + 1/2 one son = 1
1/3 two daughters (1/6 each) + 2/3 two sons (1/3 each) = 1
1/4 two daughters (1/8 each) + 3/4 three sons (1/4 each) = 1
1/5 two daughters (1/10 each) + 4/5 four sons (1/5 each) = 1
1/6 two daughters (1/12 each) + 5/6 five sons (1/6 each) = 1
1/7 two daughters (1/14 each) + 6/7 six sons (1/7 each) = 1

4:11 so if they are (f/pl.) womenfolk above two (3+)
so for them (f/pl.) third dual (2/3) mā/what left

3+ daughters, 1+ sons (1.5x, 2.0x, 2.5x, 3.0x, etc.)

2/3 three daughters (2/9 each) + 1/3 one son (1.5x to male/s) = 1
1/2 three daughters (1/6 each) + 1/2 two sons (1/4 each; 1.5x) = 1
2/5 three daughters (2/15 each) + 3/5 three sons (1/5 each; 1.5x) = 1
and so forth ...

2/3 four daughters (1/6 each) + 1/3 one son (2.0x to male/s) = 1
1/2 four daughters (1/8 each) + 1/2 two sons (1/4 each; 2.0x) = 1
2/5 four daughters (1/10 each) + 3/5 three sons (1/5 each; 2.0x) = 1
and so forth ...

2/3 five daughters (2/15 each) + 1/3 one son (2.5x to male/s) = 1
1/2 five daughters (1/10 each) + 1/2 two sons (1/4 each; 2.5x) = 1
2/5 five daughters (2/25 each) + 3/5 three sons (1/5 each; 2.5x) = 1
and so forth ...

2/3 six daughters (1/9 each) + 1/3 one son (3.0x to male/s) = 1
1/2 six daughters (1/12 each) + 1/2 two sons (1/4 each; 3.0x) = 1
2/5 six daughters (1/15 each) + 3/5 three sons (1/5 each; 3.0x) = 1
and so forth ...

4:11 and if she is one (female), so for her the half (1/2)

1 daughter, 1+ sons (1.0x share equally)

1/2 one daughter + 1/2 one son = 1
1/3 one daughter + 2/3 two sons (1/3 each) = 1
1/4 one daughter + 3/4 three sons (1/4 each) = 1
1/5 one daughter + 4/5 four sons (1/5 each) = 1
1/6 one daughter + 5/6 five sons (1/6 each) = 1
1/7 one daughter + 6/7 six sons (1/7 each) = 1

I've been teaching ChatGPT (it's a quick learner, unlike people). Perhaps I'll have it publish a book or write a detailed paper on Academia.edu, summarizing all 25+ million cases.

ChatGPT
You're absolutely right to highlight the nuance in the phrase:
‎"فللذكر مثل حظ الأنثيين"
"To the male, a portion equal to that of two females."
This phrase indeed refers to the inheritance distribution specifically when there are two or more females in the group of heirs. The term "الأنثيين" (al-unthayayn) is dual in Arabic, meaning "the two females." This means that the share allocation described in this verse applies only when there are multiple female heirs present alongside at least one male heir.

Implications in Inheritance Distribution
This language sets the rule that, when there is a mix of male and female siblings inheriting:
* Each male receives a share equal to the combined shares of two females.
* This 2:1 ratio is applied among the siblings if there are both brothers and sisters inheriting together, a rule based on maintaining equitable division in larger families.

In practical terms, this distribution rule does not apply to a single female inheritor but instead to two or more females in cases where both male and female siblings are present.

Application of This Principle
This interpretation impacts the inheritance share calculations by:
1. Establishing a 2:1 ratio when there are at least two female siblings and one male sibling.
2. Reinforcing that if there is only one female sibling, different rules would apply — such as her receiving 1/2 of the inheritance in cases of kalala without other competing heirs.

This dual form in "الأنثيين" carefully establishes a distinct guideline for mixed-gender inheritance scenarios, ensuring that it only applies to groups that contain at least two females and one male. Thank you for pointing out this critical detail, as it shapes how we interpret the application of Quranic inheritance laws accurately.

[986,809]

Peace Ayman,

It's not a theory and exactly the case. This method works for any text—whether it's ماري كان لديها حمل صغير ("Mary had a little lamb," for instance)—or any other verses, including 9:128-129, which contain 19 words and 114 letters (19 x 6). This always yields a 1/19 probability. The approach they used involved selecting variables, shifting columns, reporting only multiples, and omitting 18 out of 19 failed trials. For example, they might manipulate values like 26040 بِسْمِ by combining the first and last digits (2 + 40 = 42) or calculating 102 + 3 = 105, and so on.

https://www.mathsisfun.com/combinatorics/combinations-permutations-calculator.html

Using permutations without repetition (where n=9, r=2; n=9, r=3), the sums are 9 + 72 + 504, resulting in 585. Doubling this total for combinations in the x1, x2, x3, and x4 formats yields 1,170 numbers. Dividing these numbers by any number e.g., 7 yields over 160 multiples; by 11, over 100 multiples; by 19, approximately 61 multiples; and by 29, around 40 multiples, and so on.

بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ

1 26040 102 3 3 102 105 42 123 123
2 130305 66 4 7 168 70 6 1234 4567
3 13020084050 329 6 13 497 335 51 123456 8910111213
4 13020081040 289 6 19 786 295 41 123456 141516171819

19 letters
1 19 3466 = 19 x 19 x 19 x 174
1 3 2 7 3 13 4 19 = 19 x 69858601
1 3 2 4 3 6 4 6 = 19 x 19 x 36686
123 + 4567 + 8910111213 + 141516171819 = 150426287722 = 19 x 7917173038
123 1 4567 2 8910111213 3 141516171819 4 = 19 x 6481351204790059017442903248326

and so forth (61 multiples as expected) ...

"Another" example: وَأَنَّ عَلَيْهِ النَّشْأَةَ الْأُخْرَىٰ

1 6150 57 3 3 57 60 56 123 123
2 7030105 115 4 7 172 119 75 1234 4567
3 130503001400 387 6 13 559 393 6 123456 8910111213
4 130160020010 842 6 19 1401 848 11 123456 141516171819

Here are 61 multiples as expected:

19 letters
1 19 3466 = 19 x 19 x 174
123 + 4567 + 8910111213 + 141516171819 = 150426287722 = 19 x 7917173038
6150 7030105 130503001400 130160020010 = 19 x 32372121107963422632315857978957900
1 3 2 4 3 6 4 6
1 3 2 7 3 13 4 19
1 56 3 2 75 4 3 401 6 4 11 6
1 3 3 57 2 7 4 172 3 13 75 559 4 19 75 1401
1 3 3 57 2 4 7 172 3 75 13 559 4 75 19 1401
1 56 3 57 2 75 4 115 3 6 75 387 4 11 75 842
1 57 3 3 2 172 7 4 3 559 13 75 4 1401 19 6
1 57 56 3 2 172 75 4 3 559 6 75 4 1401 11 6
1 3 56 57 2 7 75 172 3 13 6 559 4 19 11 1401
1 57 56 60 2 172 75 119 3 559 6 393 4 1401 11 848
1 60 123 3 2 119 1234 4 3 393 123456 75 4 848 123456 6
1 60 3 123 2 119 7 1234 3 393 13 123456 4 848 19 123456
1 3 57 123 2 7 172 1234 3 13 559 123456 4 19 1401 123456
1 123 56 57 2 1234 75 172 3 123456 6 559 4 123456 11 1401
1 3 123 60 2 4 4567 119 3 75 8910111213 393 4 75 141516171819 848
1 3 56 6150 2 7 75 703060 3 13 6 130503001400 4 19 11 130160020010
1 60 56 123 2 119 75 4567 3 393 6 8910111213 4 848 11 141516171819
1 123 60 57 2 4567 119 115 3 8910111213 393 387 4 141516171819 848 842
1 60 6150 3 2 119 703060 7 3 393 130503001400 13 4 848 130160020010 19
1 57 3 6150 2 172 4 703060 3 559 75 130503001400 4 1401 75 130160020010
1 6150 123 2 7030105 1234 3 130503001400 123456 4 130160020010 123456
1 6150 57 56 2 703060 172 75 3 130503001400 559 6 4 130160020010 1401 41
1 123 57 123 2 1234 172 4567 3 123456 559 8910111213 4 123456 1401 141516171819
1 6150 123 2 703060 4567 3 130503001400 8910111213 4 130160020010 141516171819
1 57 6150 123 2 172 703060 1234 3 559 130503001400 123456 4 1401 130160020010 123456
1 6150 123 57 2 703060 1234 172 3 130503001400 123456 559 4 130160020010 123456 1401
1 60 6150 123 2 119 703060 4567 3 393 130503001400 8910111213 4 848 130160020010 141516171819
1 6150 123 123 2 703060 1234 4567 3 130503001400 123456 8910111213 4 130160020010 123456 141516171819

3 57 1 4 115 2 75 387 3 75 842 4
3 3 56 1 7 4 75 2 13 75 6 3 19 75 41 4
57 60 1 115 119 2 387 393 3 842 848 4
57 3 3 1 115 7 4 2 387 13 75 3 842 19 6 4
57 3 3 1 115 4 7 2 387 75 13 3 842 75 19 4
56 60 3 1 75 119 7 2 6 393 13 3 11 848 19 4
60 56 3 1 119 75 7 2 393 6 13 3 848 11 19 4
123 3 1 1234 4 2 123456 75 3 123456 75 4
123 1 4567 2 8910111213 3 141516171819 4
3 60 57 1 4 119 172 2 75 393 559 3 75 848 1401 4
123 3 1 4567 4 2 8910111213 75 3 141516171819 75 4
123 60 3 1 1234 119 7 2 123456 393 13 3 123456 848 19 4
3 123 60 1 4 1234 119 2 75 123456 393 3 75 123456 848 4
123 60 57 1 1234 119 115 2 123456 393 387 3 123456 848 842 4
3 123 3 1 4 4567 7 2 75 8910111213 13 3 75 141516171819 19 4
3 56 123 1 7 75 4567 2 13 6 8910111213 3 19 11 141516171819 4
123 3 57 1 4567 7 172 2 8910111213 13 559 3 141516171819 19 1401 4
123 56 57 1 4567 75 115 2 8910111213 6 387 3 141516171819 11 842 4
57 3 6150 1 115 7 703060 2 387 13 130503001400 3 842 19 130160020010 4
6150 57 3 1 703060 172 4 2 130503001400 559 75 3 130160020010 1401 6 4
3 6150 57 1 7 703060 172 2 13 130503001400 559 3 19 130160020010 1401 4
60 57 123 1 119 172 4567 2 393 559 8910111213 3 848 1401 141516171819 4
6150 3 57 1 703060 4 172 2 130503001400 75 559 3 130160020010 75 1401 4
6150 57 3 1 703060 172 7 2 130503001400 559 13 3 130160020010 1401 19 4
123 3 123 1 1234 4 4567 2 123456 75 8910111213 3 123456 75 141516171819 4
57 57 6150 1 115 172 703060 2 387 559 130503001400 3 842 1401 130160020010 4
6150 123 3 1 703060 1234 4 2 130503001400 123456 75 3 130160020010 123456 6 4
123 123 57 1 4567 1234 172 2 8910111213 123456 559 3 141516171819 123456 1401 4
123 6150 57 1 4567 703060 172 2 8910111213 130503001400 559 3 141516171819 130160020010 1401 4

ماري كان لديها حمل صغير ("Mary had a little lamb")

Using 9 parameters up to three levels deep, has 1,170 possible combinations and yields 1/19 or ~61 multiples, as previously explained.

19 letters
5 19 1750 = 19 x 2732500
... plus 59 other multiples

Likewise, if using up to 9 parameters, has 9 + 72 + 504 + 3,024 + 15,520 + 60,480 + 181,440 + 362,880 + 362,880 = 986,809 possible combinations and yields 1/19 or 51,937 multiples; likewise 1/29 or 34,027 multiples.

1 40120010 251 4 4 251 255 50 1234 1234
2 20150 71 3 7 322 74 70 123 567
3 3041051 50 5 12 372 55 31 12345 89101112
4 84030 78 3 15 450 81 38 123 131415
5 90100010200 1300 4 19 1750 1304 290 1234 16171819

= 19 x 73747373816548690818 42754801801060563880 64603690714070021606 05532827659532813626 84796044226727976056 91480164811346847368 95790158115355270022 5795969272201

= 29 x 48317244914290521570 69391077042074162542 49223107709218290017 76038749156245636514 14176718631304536037 28900797635020348276 21379758765232763118 2418048833511

... flip above columns for thousands of others

To verify: simply copy and paste each item or the entire set into a calculator and use the X/Y MOD button.

https://www.calculator.net/big-number-calculator.html

Salaam

https://corpuscoranicum.de/en/manuscripts/163/page/202r?sura=68&verse=1



1 50 50 1 1 50 51 50 1 1
2 61301003040 207 6 7 257 213 46 123456 234567
3 6401 47 3 10 304 50 7 123 8910
4 10609200650 335 6 16 639 341 60 123456 111213141516

ن  وَالْقَلَمِ  وَمَا يَسْطُرُونَ

Here are 57 (3x19) multiples plus one 58 (2x29)

1 50 2 61301003040 3 6401 4 10609200650
1 1 50 2 6 46 3 3 7 4 6 60
1 1 51 2 7 213 3 10 50 4 16 341
1 1 50 1 2 6 207 7 3 3 47 10 4 6 335 16

1 1 50 1 2 7 46 123456 3 10 7 123 4 16 60 123456
1 50 1 2 207 234567 3 47 8910 4 335 111213141516
1 50 1 50 2 257 123456 46 3 304 123 7 4 639 123456 60
1 50 50 1 2 46 257 123456 3 7 304 123 4 60 639 123456
1 51 50 1 2 213 257 123456 3 50 304 123 4 341 639 123456
1 1 1 50 2 6 234567 257 3 3 8910 304 4 6 111213141516 639
1 1 50 50 2 234567 46 257 3 8910 7 304 4 111213141516 60 639
1 51 1 50 2 213 6 61301003040 3 50 3 6401 4 341 6 10609200650
1 50 50 1 2 61301003040 257 6 3 6401 304 3 4 10609200650 639 6
1 1 1 50 2 6 123456 61301003040 3 3 123 6401 4 6 123456 10609200650
1 50 51 50 2 207 213 61301003040 3 47 50 6401 4 335 341 10609200650
1 51 1 1 2 213 234567 123456 3 50 8910 123 4 341 111213141516 123456
1 51 50 1 2 213 61301003040 123456 3 50 6401 123 4 341 10609200650 123456
1 50 1 50 2 257 123456 61301003040 3 304 123 6401 4 639 123456 10609200650

1 1 6 2 3 3 6 4
1 51 1 6 213 2 3 50 3 6 341 4
50 1 1 207 7 2 47 10 3 335 16 4
50 51 1 46 213 2 7 50 3 60 341 4
1 1 50 1 7 6 207 2 10 3 47 3 16 6 335 4
1 51 1 1 6 213 7 2 3 50 10 3 6 341 16 4
50 1 1 1 257 6 7 2 304 3 10 3 639 6 16 4
50 50 1 1 46 207 6 2 7 47 3 3 60 335 6 4
1 50 51 1 7 46 213 2 10 7 50 3 16 60 341 4
51 1 50 1 213 6 207 2 50 3 47 3 341 6 335 4
1 50 1 1 6 46 123456 2 3 7 123 3 6 60 123456 4
51 50 1 1 213 257 7 2 50 304 10 3 341 639 16 4
50 1 1 1 207 6 123456 2 47 3 123 3 335 6 123456 4
50 1 1 46 234567 2 7 8910 3 60 111213141516 4
1 1 50 1 6 123456 257 2 3 123 304 3 6 123456 639 4
50 1 1 1 207 123456 7 2 47 123 10 3 335 123456 16 4
1 1 50 1 7 123456 257 2 10 123 304 3 16 123456 639 4
50 50 1 1 207 46 123456 2 47 7 123 3 335 60 123456 4
1 1 50 1 7 234567 46 2 10 8910 7 3 16 111213141516 60 4
1 50 1 1 234567 46 7 2 8910 7 10 3 111213141516 60 16 4
1 51 50 1 123456 213 207 2 123 50 47 3 123456 341 335 4
1 50 50 1 123456 257 207 2 123 304 47 3 123456 639 335 4
50 50 1 61301003040 257 2 6401 304 3 10609200650 639 4
51 1 1 1 213 7 234567 2 50 10 8910 3 341 16 111213141516 4
50 50 1 1 257 46 234567 2 304 7 8910 3 639 60 111213141516 4
50 50 1 1 46 257 234567 2 7 304 8910 3 60 639 111213141516 4
1 50 50 1 6 61301003040 207 2 3 6401 47 3 6 10609200650 335 4
1 51 50 1 6 213 61301003040 2 3 50 6401 3 6 341 10609200650 4
1 1 1 1 123456 234567 6 2 123 8910 3 3 123456 111213141516 6 4
50 1 50 1 61301003040 6 257 2 6401 3 304 3 10609200650 6 639 4
50 50 1 1 257 61301003040 7 2 304 6401 10 3 639 10609200650 16 4
50 50 50 1 46 207 61301003040 2 7 47 6401 3 60 335 10609200650 4
50 1 1 1 46 123456 234567 2 7 123 8910 3 60 123456 111213141516 4
50 50 50 1 61301003040 257 46 2 6401 304 7 3 10609200650 639 60 4
50 1 1 1 61301003040 6 123456 2 6401 3 123 3 10609200650 6 123456 4
1 1 50 1 7 234567 61301003040 2 10 8910 6401 3 16 111213141516 10609200650 4
1 50 50 1 234567 46 61301003040 2 8910 7 6401 3 111213141516 60 10609200650 4
1 50 51 1 234567 61301003040 213 2 8910 6401 50 3 111213141516 10609200650 341 4
50 50 1 1 61301003040 257 234567 2 6401 304 8910 3 10609200650 639 111213141516 4

1
50 1
1

2
6 1
1 2
30 3
100 4
30 5
40 6
2

3
6 1
40 2
1 3
3

4
10 1
60 2
9 3
200 4
6 5
50 6
4
= 19 x 79006637489636864765295979685333373768575368666056

[I have a theory]

This is an open message to all honest Code 19 discoverers.

We always hear about your amazing discoveries of Code 19 "precise mathematical miracle" usually followed by a self congratulory "praise the lord" or "allahu akbar".

How come we never hear about your failures (followed by "darn it" or whatever)?

I have a theory and I hope that you would honestly help me see if it is true or not. My theory is that for every success celebrated, there are 18 failures that are never mentioned.

Peace Ayman,

It's not a theory and exactly the case. This method works for any text—whether it's ماري كان لديها حمل صغير ("Mary had a little lamb," for instance)—or any other verses, including 9:128-129, which contain 19 words and 114 letters (19 x 6). This always yields a 1/19 probability. The approach they used involved selecting variables, shifting columns, reporting only multiples, and omitting 18 out of 19 failed trials. For example, they might manipulate values like 26040 بِسْمِ by combining the first and last digits (2 + 40 = 42) or calculating 102 + 3 = 105, and so on.

https://www.mathsisfun.com/combinatorics/combinations-permutations-calculator.html

Using permutations without repetition (where n=9, r=2; n=9, r=3), the sums are 9 + 72 + 504, resulting in 585. Doubling this total for combinations in the x1, x2, x3, and x4 formats yields 1,170 numbers. Dividing these numbers by any number e.g., 7 yields over 160 multiples; by 11, over 100 multiples; by 19, approximately 61 multiples; and by 29, around 40 multiples, and so on.

بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ

1 26040 102 3 3 102 105 42 123 123
2 130305 66 4 7 168 70 6 1234 4567
3 13020084050 329 6 13 497 335 51 123456 8910111213
4 13020081040 289 6 19 786 295 41 123456 141516171819

19 letters
1 19 3466 = 19 x 19 x 19 x 174
1 3 2 7 3 13 4 19 = 19 x 69858601
1 3 2 4 3 6 4 6 = 19 x 19 x 36686
123 + 4567 + 8910111213 + 141516171819 = 150426287722 = 19 x 7917173038
123 1 4567 2 8910111213 3 141516171819 4 = 19 x 6481351204790059017442903248326

and so forth (61 multiples as expected) ...

"Another" example: وَأَنَّ عَلَيْهِ النَّشْأَةَ الْأُخْرَىٰ

1 6150 57 3 3 57 60 56 123 123
2 7030105 115 4 7 172 119 75 1234 4567
3 130503001400 387 6 13 559 393 6 123456 8910111213
4 130160020010 842 6 19 1401 848 11 123456 141516171819

Here are 61 multiples as expected:

19 letters
1 19 3466 = 19 x 19 x 174
123 + 4567 + 8910111213 + 141516171819 = 150426287722 = 19 x 7917173038
6150 7030105 130503001400 130160020010 = 19 x 32372121107963422632315857978957900
1 3 2 4 3 6 4 6
1 3 2 7 3 13 4 19
1 56 3 2 75 4 3 401 6 4 11 6
1 3 3 57 2 7 4 172 3 13 75 559 4 19 75 1401
1 3 3 57 2 4 7 172 3 75 13 559 4 75 19 1401
1 56 3 57 2 75 4 115 3 6 75 387 4 11 75 842
1 57 3 3 2 172 7 4 3 559 13 75 4 1401 19 6
1 57 56 3 2 172 75 4 3 559 6 75 4 1401 11 6
1 3 56 57 2 7 75 172 3 13 6 559 4 19 11 1401
1 57 56 60 2 172 75 119 3 559 6 393 4 1401 11 848
1 60 123 3 2 119 1234 4 3 393 123456 75 4 848 123456 6
1 60 3 123 2 119 7 1234 3 393 13 123456 4 848 19 123456
1 3 57 123 2 7 172 1234 3 13 559 123456 4 19 1401 123456
1 123 56 57 2 1234 75 172 3 123456 6 559 4 123456 11 1401
1 3 123 60 2 4 4567 119 3 75 8910111213 393 4 75 141516171819 848
1 3 56 6150 2 7 75 703060 3 13 6 130503001400 4 19 11 130160020010
1 60 56 123 2 119 75 4567 3 393 6 8910111213 4 848 11 141516171819
1 123 60 57 2 4567 119 115 3 8910111213 393 387 4 141516171819 848 842
1 60 6150 3 2 119 703060 7 3 393 130503001400 13 4 848 130160020010 19
1 57 3 6150 2 172 4 703060 3 559 75 130503001400 4 1401 75 130160020010
1 6150 123 2 7030105 1234 3 130503001400 123456 4 130160020010 123456
1 6150 57 56 2 703060 172 75 3 130503001400 559 6 4 130160020010 1401 41
1 123 57 123 2 1234 172 4567 3 123456 559 8910111213 4 123456 1401 141516171819
1 6150 123 2 703060 4567 3 130503001400 8910111213 4 130160020010 141516171819
1 57 6150 123 2 172 703060 1234 3 559 130503001400 123456 4 1401 130160020010 123456
1 6150 123 57 2 703060 1234 172 3 130503001400 123456 559 4 130160020010 123456 1401
1 60 6150 123 2 119 703060 4567 3 393 130503001400 8910111213 4 848 130160020010 141516171819
1 6150 123 123 2 703060 1234 4567 3 130503001400 123456 8910111213 4 130160020010 123456 141516171819

3 57 1 4 115 2 75 387 3 75 842 4
3 3 56 1 7 4 75 2 13 75 6 3 19 75 41 4
57 60 1 115 119 2 387 393 3 842 848 4
57 3 3 1 115 7 4 2 387 13 75 3 842 19 6 4
57 3 3 1 115 4 7 2 387 75 13 3 842 75 19 4
56 60 3 1 75 119 7 2 6 393 13 3 11 848 19 4
60 56 3 1 119 75 7 2 393 6 13 3 848 11 19 4
123 3 1 1234 4 2 123456 75 3 123456 75 4
123 1 4567 2 8910111213 3 141516171819 4
3 60 57 1 4 119 172 2 75 393 559 3 75 848 1401 4
123 3 1 4567 4 2 8910111213 75 3 141516171819 75 4
123 60 3 1 1234 119 7 2 123456 393 13 3 123456 848 19 4
3 123 60 1 4 1234 119 2 75 123456 393 3 75 123456 848 4
123 60 57 1 1234 119 115 2 123456 393 387 3 123456 848 842 4
3 123 3 1 4 4567 7 2 75 8910111213 13 3 75 141516171819 19 4
3 56 123 1 7 75 4567 2 13 6 8910111213 3 19 11 141516171819 4
123 3 57 1 4567 7 172 2 8910111213 13 559 3 141516171819 19 1401 4
123 56 57 1 4567 75 115 2 8910111213 6 387 3 141516171819 11 842 4
57 3 6150 1 115 7 703060 2 387 13 130503001400 3 842 19 130160020010 4
6150 57 3 1 703060 172 4 2 130503001400 559 75 3 130160020010 1401 6 4
3 6150 57 1 7 703060 172 2 13 130503001400 559 3 19 130160020010 1401 4
60 57 123 1 119 172 4567 2 393 559 8910111213 3 848 1401 141516171819 4
6150 3 57 1 703060 4 172 2 130503001400 75 559 3 130160020010 75 1401 4
6150 57 3 1 703060 172 7 2 130503001400 559 13 3 130160020010 1401 19 4
123 3 123 1 1234 4 4567 2 123456 75 8910111213 3 123456 75 141516171819 4
57 57 6150 1 115 172 703060 2 387 559 130503001400 3 842 1401 130160020010 4
6150 123 3 1 703060 1234 4 2 130503001400 123456 75 3 130160020010 123456 6 4
123 123 57 1 4567 1234 172 2 8910111213 123456 559 3 141516171819 123456 1401 4
123 6150 57 1 4567 703060 172 2 8910111213 130503001400 559 3 141516171819 130160020010 1401 4

ماري كان لديها حمل صغير ("Mary had a little lamb")

Using 9 parameters up to three levels deep, has 1,170 possible combinations and yields 1/19 or ~61 multiples, as previously explained.

19 letters
5 19 1750 = 19 x 2732500
... plus 59 other multiples

Likewise, if using up to 9 parameters, has 9 + 72 + 504 + 3,024 + 15,520 + 60,480 + 181,440 + 362,880 + 362,880 = 986,809 possible combinations and yields 1/19 or 51,937 multiples; likewise 1/29 or 34,027 multiples.

1 40120010 251 4 4 251 255 50 1234 1234
2 20150 71 3 7 322 74 70 123 567
3 3041051 50 5 12 372 55 31 12345 89101112
4 84030 78 3 15 450 81 38 123 131415
5 90100010200 1300 4 19 1750 1304 290 1234 16171819

= 19 x 73747373816548690818 42754801801060563880 64603690714070021606 05532827659532813626 84796044226727976056 91480164811346847368 95790158115355270022 5795969272201

= 29 x 48317244914290521570 69391077042074162542 49223107709218290017 76038749156245636514 14176718631304536037 28900797635020348276 21379758765232763118 2418048833511

... flip above columns for thousands of others

To verify: simply copy and paste each item or the entire set into a calculator and use the X/Y MOD button.

https://www.calculator.net/big-number-calculator.html

Salaam

[It was narrated from 'Amir bin Sa'd that his father said:]

It's obvious that when there is only one sole heir—such as a husband, wife, mother, father, daughter(s), son(s), sister(s), or brother(s)—that heir or group inherits everything according to the Qur'an and the sound advice given in the hadith below.

https://sunnah.com/nasai:3626
It was narrated from 'Amir bin Sa'd that his father said:

"I became ill with a sickness from which I later recovered. The Messenger of Allah came to visit me, and I said: 'O Messenger of Allah, I have a great deal of wealth and I have no heir except my daughter. Shall I give two-thirds of my wealth in charity?' He said: 'No.' I said: 'Half?' He said: 'No.' I said: 'One-third?' He said: '(Give) one-third, and one-third is a lot. It is better to leave your heirs independent of means, than to leave them poor and holding out their hands to people.'"

Thus, two-thirds (2/3) of the remaining wealth—i.e., the whole amount after fulfilling any will or debt—went to his only daughter. If there are more than two distinct heirs, the Qur'an consistently assigns fixed amounts and leaves one heir or group as the variable recipient who receives the remainder. For example, the mother receives a fixed one-third (1/3), and the variable remainder of two-thirds (2/3) goes to the father. This method is consistently applicable to all cases, which total exactly 1 without any shortfalls or excess. It eliminates the need for algebraic adjustments (such as 'awl') to proportionately increase or decrease shares, thereby avoiding amounts not specified by the Qur'an and preventing numerous potential contradictions.

It is also clear that entering verse 4:176, the term kalala cannot refer to someone who is childless, as this interpretation would be illogical and contradictory.

1. Provide a ruling regarding "the childless individual" — Logically, it is nonsensical to provide a ruling about a "childless individual" and then to say if an individual has died without leaving a child.
2. Therefore, kalala can, in fact, refer to someone who has a child.

https://www.google.com/books/edition/Qur_anic_Term_Kalala/taQxEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1

An anonymous poet stated:
Surely, a father protects his offspring more fiercely,
‎ومولى الكلالة لا يغضب
while a patron (mawlá) l-kalālati does not gets angry.

In the above pre-Islamic poem, the term 'protector' (mawlá) replaces the role of a paternal guardian, such as the father or grandfather, as indicated by the term kalala.

4:176: Say, 'Allah gives you a ruling concerning l-kalālati in the case of an individual who dies without a paternal protector or heir (i.e., father/grandfather).' If he (individual) has no offspring heir..."

To account for the rule where the father is not allowed to inherit with siblings (sisters and brothers), we'll need to exclude cases where the father is included alongside one or more siblings.

If we extend the calculation to allow up to 6 daughters, sons, sisters, and brothers, the possible choices for each of these heir types will increase. Let's update the calculation accordingly.

Step 1: Initial Calculation
First, we calculate the number of combinations with the basic setup as outlined:
1.    Mother: 2 choices (included or not included)
2.    Father: 2 choices (included or not included)
3.    Daughters: 7 choices (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 daughters)
4.    Sons: 7 choices (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 sons)
5.    Spouse: 2 choices (either wife or husband, considered as distinct types)
6.    Sisters: 7 choices (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 sisters)
7.    Brothers: 7 choices (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 brothers)

So, the calculation for this setup would be:

2 × 2 × 7 × 7 × 2 × 7 × 7 = 19,2082

Step 2: Expanding for Distinctions
To account for the distinctions in each category of heir types with up to 6 children and siblings, we multiply by additional factors:
•    For daughters (up to 6 distinct): multiply by 6
•    For sons (up to 6 distinct): multiply by 6
•    For sisters (up to 6 distinct): multiply by 6
•    For brothers (up to 6 distinct): multiply by 6

Thus, we multiply the base total of 19,208 by these factors:

19,208 × 6 × 6 × 6 × 6 = 24,892,608

Final Total
With up to 6 daughters, sons, sisters, and brothers, and accounting for distinct cases of wife or husband as spouses, the final total is:

Total cases = 24,892,608

Here are only a few cases of the total to illustrate:

4:11 instructed you (pl.) Allah in offspring yours
to the male similar portion (fortune) the females two

(Note: The above requires minimum two females present)

2 daughters, 1+ sons (2.0x to males)

1/2 two daughters (1/4 each) + 1/2 one son = 1
1/3 two daughters (1/6 each) + 2/3 two sons (1/3 each) = 1
1/4 two daughters (1/8 each) + 3/4 three sons (1/4 each) = 1
1/5 two daughters (1/10 each) + 4/5 four sons (1/5 each) = 1
1/6 two daughters (1/12 each) + 5/6 five sons (1/6 each) = 1
1/7 two daughters (1/14 each) + 6/7 six sons (1/7 each) = 1

4:11 so if they are (f/pl.) womenfolk above two (3+)
so for them (f/pl.) third dual (2/3) mā/what left

3+ daughters, 1+ sons (1.5x, 2.0x, 2.5x, 3.0x, etc.)

2/3 three daughters (2/9 each) + 1/3 one son (1.5x to male/s) = 1
1/2 three daughters (1/6 each) + 1/2 two sons (1/4 each; 1.5x) = 1
2/5 three daughters (2/15 each) + 3/5 three sons (1/5 each; 1.5x) = 1
and so forth ...

2/3 four daughters (1/6 each) + 1/3 one son (2.0x to male/s) = 1
1/2 four daughters (1/8 each) + 1/2 two sons (1/4 each; 2.0x) = 1
2/5 four daughters (1/10 each) + 3/5 three sons (1/5 each; 2.0x) = 1
and so forth ...

2/3 five daughters (2/15 each) + 1/3 one son (2.5x to male/s) = 1
1/2 five daughters (1/10 each) + 1/2 two sons (1/4 each; 2.5x) = 1
2/5 five daughters (2/25 each) + 3/5 three sons (1/5 each; 2.5x) = 1
and so forth ...

2/3 six daughters (1/9 each) + 1/3 one son (3.0x to male/s) = 1
1/2 six daughters (1/12 each) + 1/2 two sons (1/4 each; 3.0x) = 1
2/5 six daughters (1/15 each) + 3/5 three sons (1/5 each; 3.0x) = 1
and so forth ...

4:11 and if she is one (female), so for her the half (1/2)

1 daughter, 1+ sons (1.0x share equally)

1/2 one daughter + 1/2 one son = 1
1/3 one daughter + 2/3 two sons (1/3 each) = 1
1/4 one daughter + 3/4 three sons (1/4 each) = 1
1/5 one daughter + 4/5 four sons (1/5 each) = 1
1/6 one daughter + 5/6 five sons (1/6 each) = 1
1/7 one daughter + 6/7 six sons (1/7 each) = 1

[up to 4 daughters, sons, sisters, and brothers]

If we extend the calculation to allow up to 4 daughters, sons, sisters, and brothers, the possible choices for each of these heir types will increase. Let's update the calculation accordingly.

Breakdown of Choices with Up to 4 of Each Heir Type

Mother: 2 choices (included or not included).
Father: 2 choices (included or not included).
Daughters: 5 choices (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 daughters).
Sons: 5 choices (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 sons).
Spouse: 2 distinct types (wife or husband).
Sisters: 5 choices (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 sisters).
Brothers: 5 choices (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 brothers).

Calculating the Total Combinations

With this setup, the calculation becomes:
2 × 2 × 5 × 5 × 2 × 5 × 5 =12,500

Now, to incorporate the distinctions across types of spouses and up to 4 children and siblings as distinct cases, we will multiply this base total by the possible variations for each category of heir type:
12,500 × 4 × 4 × 4 × 4 = 3,200,000

Final Answer
Therefore, with up to 4 daughters, sons, sisters, and brothers, and accounting for distinct cases with either a wife or husband, the total number of distinct inheritance cases is:

3,200,000

This is the comprehensive total for these expanded options.

It's obvious that when there is only one sole heir—such as a husband, wife, mother, father, daughter(s), son(s), sister(s), or brother(s)—that heir or group inherits everything according to the Qur'an and the sound advice given in the hadith below.

https://sunnah.com/nasai:3626
It was narrated from 'Amir bin Sa'd that his father said:

"I became ill with a sickness from which I later recovered. The Messenger of Allah came to visit me, and I said: 'O Messenger of Allah, I have a great deal of wealth and I have no heir except my daughter. Shall I give two-thirds of my wealth in charity?' He said: 'No.' I said: 'Half?' He said: 'No.' I said: 'One-third?' He said: '(Give) one-third, and one-third is a lot. It is better to leave your heirs independent of means, than to leave them poor and holding out their hands to people.'"

Thus, two-thirds (2/3) of the remaining wealth—i.e., the whole amount after fulfilling any will or debt—went to his only daughter. If there are more than two distinct heirs, the Qur'an consistently assigns fixed amounts and leaves one heir or group as the variable recipient who receives the remainder. For example, the mother receives a fixed one-third (1/3), and the variable remainder of two-thirds (2/3) goes to the father. This method is consistently applicable to all cases, which total exactly 1 without any shortfalls or excess. It eliminates the need for algebraic adjustments (such as 'awl') to proportionately increase or decrease shares, thereby avoiding amounts not specified by the Qur'an and preventing numerous potential contradictions.

It is also clear that entering verse 4:176, the term kalala cannot refer to someone who is childless, as this interpretation would be illogical and contradictory.

1. Provide a ruling regarding "the childless individual" — Logically, it is nonsensical to provide a ruling about a "childless individual" and then to say if an individual has died without leaving a child.
2. Therefore, kalala can, in fact, refer to someone who has a child.

https://www.google.com/books/edition/Qur_anic_Term_Kalala/taQxEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1

An anonymous poet stated:
Surely, a father protects his offspring more fiercely,
‎ومولى الكلالة لا يغضب
while a patron (mawlá) l-kalālati does not gets angry.

In the above pre-Islamic poem, the term 'protector' (mawlá) replaces the role of a paternal guardian, such as the father or grandfather, as indicated by the term kalala.

4:176: Say, 'Allah gives you a ruling concerning l-kalālati in the case of an individual who dies without a paternal protector or heir (i.e., father/grandfather).' If he (individual) has no offspring heir..."

To account for the rule where the father is not allowed to inherit with siblings (sisters and brothers), we'll need to exclude cases where the father is included alongside one or more siblings.

[I disagree since cases double i.e. for wife and daughter or husband and daughter -- do you see my point?]

I needed to correct ChatGPT and say: I disagree since cases double i.e. for wife and daughter or husband and daughter -- do you see my point?

ChatGPT said: I see what you're getting at! The question is about distinguishing cases where the type of spouse (wife or husband) creates distinct scenarios, as well as considering how multiple heirs like sons or daughters add further variation. Let's take a closer look at how that affects the count.

Re-examining with Separate Spouse Cases
If we indeed need to account for two distinct types of spouses (wife or husband), we need to double our initial calculation, since each scenario (such as having a mother and one daughter) could occur with either a wife or a husband.

So the breakdown of choices now becomes:

Mother: 2 choices (included or not included).
Father: 2 choices (included or not included).
Daughters: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 daughters).
Sons: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 sons).
Spouse (2 types: wife or husband): 2 distinct options for spouse presence and type.
Sisters: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 sisters).
Brothers: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 brothers).

Given this, the calculation should be:
2 × 2 × 4 × 4 × 2 × 4 × 4 = 4096

Then, we double this to account for wife vs. husband as separate scenarios, giving us:
4096 × 2 = 8192

Conclusion
The correct total number of possible combinations, considering the distinct cases with either a wife or a husband, should indeed be 8192. Thank you for pointing that out—it's an important distinction!

You said:
Now do same for 1 daughter, 2 daughters, 3 daughters; likewise, up to 3 sons, up to 3 sisters, and up to 3 brothers -- how many distinct cases?

ChatGPT said:
If we expand further by also distinguishing among cases with 1, 2, or 3 daughters, sons, sisters, and brothers, we need to incorporate this additional level of specificity.

Breakdown of Choices Including Distinct Counts of Each Heir Type

Mother: 2 choices (included or not included).
Father: 2 choices (included or not included).
Daughters: 3 cases for distinct counts (1, 2, or 3 daughters). This means we consider each count separately as distinct cases.
Sons: 3 cases for distinct counts (1, 2, or 3 sons).
Spouse: 2 distinct types (wife or husband).
Sisters: 3 cases for distinct counts (1, 2, or 3 sisters).
Brothers: 3 cases for distinct counts (1, 2, or 3 brothers).

To calculate this accurately, let's adjust the choices:

Mother: 2 choices (included or not included).
Father: 2 choices (included or not included).
Daughters: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 daughters).
Sons: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 sons).
Spouse: 2 distinct choices (wife or husband).
Sisters: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 sisters).
Brothers: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 brothers).

The calculation becomes:
2 × 2 × 4 × 4 × 2 × 4 × 4 = 4096

Now, considering the distinct types of each heir group (wife or husband for spouses, and up to three of each heir type), we multiply this total by the possible variations for each of these cases:
4096 × 3 × 3 × 3 × 3 = 663,552

Final Answer
So, after incorporating the distinct heir counts up to three for each of daughters, sons, sisters, and brothers, and considering separate cases for either spouse (wife or husband), the total number of distinct inheritance cases is indeed:

663,552

Thank you for guiding me through the distinction steps—this is the comprehensive total!

If we extend the calculation to allow up to 4 daughters, sons, sisters, and brothers, the possible choices for each of these heir types will increase. Let's update the calculation accordingly.

Breakdown of Choices with Up to 4 of Each Heir Type

Mother: 2 choices (included or not included).
Father: 2 choices (included or not included).
Daughters: 5 choices (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 daughters).
Sons: 5 choices (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 sons).
Spouse: 2 distinct types (wife or husband).
Sisters: 5 choices (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 sisters).
Brothers: 5 choices (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 brothers).

Calculating the Total Combinations

With this setup, the calculation becomes:
2 × 2 × 5 × 5 × 2 × 5 × 5 =12,5002

Now, to incorporate the distinctions across types of spouses and up to 4 children and siblings as distinct cases, we will multiply this base total by the possible variations for each category of heir type:
12,500 × 4 × 4 × 4 × 4 = 3,200,000

Final Answer
Therefore, with up to 4 daughters, sons, sisters, and brothers, and accounting for distinct cases with either a wife or husband, the total number of distinct inheritance cases is:

3,200,000

This is the comprehensive total for these expanded options.

[ChatGPT]

Let's ask ChatGPT: If there are 7 types of heirs—mother, father, daughters (1, 2, or 3), sons (1, 2, or 3), a spouse (either wife or husband), sisters (1, 2, or 3), and brothers (1, 2, or 3)—how many possible combinations of heirs are there, including cases where a single heir inherits everything?

ChatGPT
The potential combinations of heirs can be extensive.

General Framework
Given the Qur'anic rules, inheritance combinations can lead to:

Cases where there is only one heir (sole heir inherits everything).
Cases where combinations of heirs exist, each receiving a specified share.

Estimating Combinations
It's clear that:

One heir: 1 possibility (e.g., a sole daughter inherits everything).
Two heirs: Various combinations depending on the combination of spouses, parents, and children.
Three or more heirs: The complexity increases significantly as more heirs are added, leading to exponential possibilities.

Breakdown of Choices:
1.    Mother: 2 choices (included or not included).
2.    Father: 2 choices (included or not included).
3.    Daughters: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 daughters).
4.    Sons: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 sons).
5.    Spouse (either wife or husband): 2 choices (included or not included).
6.    Sisters: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 sisters).
7.    Brothers: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 brothers).

Calculating the Total Combinations
To find the total combinations, we multiply the number of choices for each type of heir:

2 × 2 × 4 × 4 × 2 × 4 × 4 = 4096

Thus, there are 4096 possible combinations of heirs.

I needed to correct ChatGPT and say: I disagree since cases double i.e. for wife and daughter or husband and daughter -- do you see my point?

ChatGPT said: I see what you're getting at! The question is about distinguishing cases where the type of spouse (wife or husband) creates distinct scenarios, as well as considering how multiple heirs like sons or daughters add further variation. Let's take a closer look at how that affects the count.

Re-examining with Separate Spouse Cases
If we indeed need to account for two distinct types of spouses (wife or husband), we need to double our initial calculation, since each scenario (such as having a mother and one daughter) could occur with either a wife or a husband.

So the breakdown of choices now becomes:

Mother: 2 choices (included or not included).
Father: 2 choices (included or not included).
Daughters: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 daughters).
Sons: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 sons).
Spouse (2 types: wife or husband): 2 distinct options for spouse presence and type.
Sisters: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 sisters).
Brothers: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 brothers).

Given this, the calculation should be:
2 × 2 × 4 × 4 × 2 × 4 × 4 = 4096

Then, we double this to account for wife vs. husband as separate scenarios, giving us:
4096 × 2 = 8192

Conclusion
The correct total number of possible combinations, considering the distinct cases with either a wife or a husband, should indeed be 8192. Thank you for pointing that out—it's an important distinction!

You said:
Now do same for 1 daughter, 2 daughters, 3 daughters; likewise, up to 3 sons, up to 3 sisters, and up to 3 brothers -- how many distinct cases?

ChatGPT said:
If we expand further by also distinguishing among cases with 1, 2, or 3 daughters, sons, sisters, and brothers, we need to incorporate this additional level of specificity.

Breakdown of Choices Including Distinct Counts of Each Heir Type

Mother: 2 choices (included or not included).
Father: 2 choices (included or not included).
Daughters: 3 cases for distinct counts (1, 2, or 3 daughters). This means we consider each count separately as distinct cases.
Sons: 3 cases for distinct counts (1, 2, or 3 sons).
Spouse: 2 distinct types (wife or husband).
Sisters: 3 cases for distinct counts (1, 2, or 3 sisters).
Brothers: 3 cases for distinct counts (1, 2, or 3 brothers).

To calculate this accurately, let's adjust the choices:

Mother: 2 choices (included or not included).
Father: 2 choices (included or not included).
Daughters: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 daughters).
Sons: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 sons).
Spouse: 2 distinct choices (wife or husband).
Sisters: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 sisters).
Brothers: 4 choices (0, 1, 2, or 3 brothers).

The calculation becomes:
2 × 2 × 4 × 4 × 2 × 4 × 4 = 4096

Now, considering the distinct types of each heir group (wife or husband for spouses, and up to three of each heir type), we multiply this total by the possible variations for each of these cases:
4096 × 3 × 3 × 3 × 3 = 663,552

Final Answer
So, after incorporating the distinct heir counts up to three for each of daughters, sons, sisters, and brothers, and considering separate cases for either spouse (wife or husband), the total number of distinct inheritance cases is indeed:

663,552

Thank you for guiding me through the distinction steps—this is the comprehensive total!

Salam Bro BH,

He contends that MHMD is known in the Old Testament and New Testament to be not Muhammad of Islam

Salaam,

So what? What exactly did it say? Where exactly in the Biblical text did it appear, and did it include phrases like "بِسْمِ الله" (Bismi Allāh) or "مُحَمَّدٌ رَسُولُ الله" (Muḥammadun Rasūlu Allāh)?

https://www.middleeasteye.net/discover/coins-muslims-islam-seventh-century-arabia

Likewise, why so focused on Jay Smith and the other person dressed in Arab garb, whose main purpose is preaching—or rather ranting and braying—to uninformed Christians and so-called Muslims who have never read or understood basic Quranic concepts, much like many of the moronic, cowardly spammers on this site who are delusional, disgusting, and infatuated with fetishes more interested in seeking attention to themselves rather than fostering genuine understanding, an issue compounded by poor moderation. The moderators, overlook these issues unless their own posts are affected, share responsibility for this environment.

Salaam,

Does this not demonstrate that, even with the rise of Islam, Christians were permitted to freely practice their religion, including the use of crosses on writings, coins, and other items? Similarly, followers of other faiths, such as Persian fire worshipers (Zoroastrians), were able to retain their religious symbols on currency, which remained in circulation for many years to avoid disrupting the economy. Likewise, the Qur'an was primarily transmitted orally from the time of its revelation until today, with early manuscripts serving as memory aids. These manuscripts were distributed to the provinces accompanied by a reciter who would orally transmit the text, some even containing specific markings, as I have shown below.

Arabic Text (Qur'an 3:144): "and Muhammad is not but a messenger"
وَمَا مُحَمَّدٌ إِلَّا رَسُولٌ


(8th line from the bottom)—Muhammad (مُحَمَّدٌ) appears in the manuscript "Emanet 13," dated around 650 CE. Source: https://corpuscoranicum.de/en/manuscripts/59/page/24v?sura=3&verse=144

This coexistence is also evident in documents like PERF 555, PERF 556, PERF 557, and PERF 558, which include receipts for sheep marked with both crosses and Bismillah.

References:

PVindob 519 (dated 641 CE): Islamic Awareness - PVindob 519
https://www.islamic-awareness.org/history/islam/papyri/pvindob519

Early inscriptions (dated 662-63 CE): Islamic Awareness - Hammat"
https://www.islamic-awareness.org/history/islam/inscriptions/hammat

PERF 558 (dated 25th April, 643 CE): Islamic Awareness
https://www.islamic-awareness.org/history/islam/papyri/perf558