I agree with Wakas.
It is a perfectly legitimate inquiry if approached objectively... What does it have to do with 'commemoration'?
Let us start with an example - hopefully by the end of the thread we may have some basic understanding on him:
Exhibit 1 - That originally he was NOT a Quraishite (person of stature or importance):
And they said: "if only this reading had been descended on a great man from the two towns." [43:31]Exhibit 2 - That he WAS instructed in religious matters - likely in Syriac (given the times):
Say: "The Holy Spirit has brought it down from your Lord with the truth, so that those who believe will be strengthened, and as a guidance and good news for those who have submitted."
And We are aware that they say: "A human being is teaching him." The tongue of the one they refer to is foreign, while this is a clear Arabic tongue. [16:102-3]Exhibit 3 - That he used to conduct night vigils
O you who are covered with your garments. Stand the night except for a little. Half of it, or a little less than that. Or a little more, and arrange the Quran in its arrangement. We will place upon you a saying which is heavy. The time of the night is more effective and better for study. [73:1-6]Exhibit 4 - That his audience had good working knowledge of Judaeo-Christian rituals
O you who are cloaked. ... And purify your garments. ... And do not give for a return. ... So when the trumpet (shofar?) is sounded. [74:1 - 8]Peace,
I see nothing wrong with loxbox deducing a biography of Muhammad's life through the Quran. I do think it's nearly, if not completely, an impossible task as:
a) The quran isn't linear
b) in order for you to piece together a chronological chain of events time x,y,z have to be present. Which is not the case when it comes to the story of Muhammad as far as I know. For example: there is no way to tell which battle comes first without resorting to guesswork/hearsay.
We are not told about the birth of Muhammad. Again we must ask ourselves why? There is a reason for everything that's in the Quran; more importantly what's NOT mentioned, for it's not relevant to our guidance. Having said that, we all have an undying sense to know everything. Curiosity came before the cat.
Based on the above, do I think its a waste of time? Sorry to be blunt, but yes. Still, Loxbox has that right. I do not think this is shrik. Let's not presuppose his intentions.