News:

About us: a forum for monotheists, and discussion of Islam based on The Quran

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Andya Primanda

#1
Quote from: drfazl on January 03, 2013, 02:57:12 AM
There are these variations and identifications of muhammad saws.

The one with:
1. A pinch of beard.
2. A handful beard.
3. Breast level beard.
4. Knee level taliban beard.
5. Beard with mustache.
6. Beard with no mustache.
7. Beard with head shaven.

And numerous combinations of all these. Which of these is the true muhammad? Or the real Muhammad had truly been saved by Allah from the advocates belonging to these groups?

Actually, one man could undergo all those facial hair arrangements in different times of his life.
#2
Science / Re: Need help with surah al shams
December 02, 2012, 11:41:10 PM
It will depend on the name of the element, "Helium". Helium is derived from Greek word "Helios" which means "Sun". The element was named so in 1868 because it was first identified from the spectrum in sunshine, and initially it was thought to be an element found only in the Sun and not on Earth.

But I find it overstretching if the Arabic letter Ha is considered to be the equivalent of the Helium symbol (He). After all, the name Helium and "He" was created by chemists, nothing magical or supernatural. Besides, the Arabic word for Sun is "Syams".
#3
Quote from: inquisitivetrini on December 02, 2012, 01:25:15 PM
I think this is what happens when people confuse the Hadith as equal to the Quran - they forget the source from which a certain statement came from. For instance, a previous teacher of mine explained to our converts class that stoning is a punishment mentioned IN THE QURAN. When I asked him to show me where (which verse), he could not and surprised himself with this fact.

Did your teacher changed his mind after discovering that fact?
#4
Quote from: AliHuzaifa on October 30, 2012, 10:30:32 PM
any ways coming back to topic, Muhammed (s) and his family shud be the role model for a muslim, and what ever manners and life style Muhammed (s) applied to his life shud be the way of life for every muslim.....



I rest my case on this note.

waakhero dawaahnaa anil humdolillah rabbil alamin

then you should give up virtual trading and do some real trading, no? because according to historical notes and hadith, The Messenger and Khadija were merchants dealing in export-import of goods.
#5
Hadith Discussions / Re: Splitting Of The Moon
October 29, 2012, 11:13:55 PM
And why are you posting this hoax?

http://www.hoax-slayer.com/moon-split-miracle.shtml
#6
By the way, I heard news that the disabled girl was framed by some ulama?
#7
Wouldn't hurt if anyone actually does the experiment now or maybe in the next Haj season.
#8
Quote from: Noon waalqalami on August 31, 2012, 02:56:14 PM
He was so obsessed and scrupulous a theologian that in his veneration for the prophet refused to eat watermelons even though he knew that the prophet enjoyed watermelons although it was not certain if to peeled off the rind, or whether he broke, bit, or like my sunnah/method use a knife and cut the watermelon!

Did a quick search and yes, there are hadith about watermelon. o_O
#9
Quote from: rameez on August 27, 2012, 07:03:52 AM
:sun:
If any consensus is there on the awra based on this Hadith alone, kindly give me the reference.

Well, I don't know how to answer this because from my own experience with the majority of traditionalist Muslims around me (Sunni using Syafi'i fiqh and some other minor variations) it is only that Asma' hadith which is used to define the female aurat. I don't know whether there are other hadith regarding the same matter. And I am not familiar with the situation in other countries or sects.

However, usually when people are taught about the female aurat, the teachers just say the limits are the whole body except for the face and hands, no mention of why it is so. It's common in religious teaching here (and maybe anywhere) to "cut the explanation" and urge laypeople to just obey. It is a practice I don't approve; we should know the reason and basis for everything we are told to believe.
#10
Should be put as an article here. Well said.