Salaam Tutti Frutti,
The annunaki are the celestial gods worshipped by the Mesopotamians. They are the gods/ goddesses of the sun, moon, stars etc.
"The earliest known usages of the term Anunnaki come from inscriptions written during the reign of Gudea (c. 2144–2124 BC) and the Third Dynasty of Ur.[9][11] In the earliest texts, the term is applied to the most powerful and important deities in the Sumerian pantheon: the descendants of the sky-god An.[9][26]This group of deities probably included the "seven gods who decree":[27] An, Enlil, Enki, Ninhursag, Nanna, Utu, and Inanna.[28]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anunnaki
you take what fits in Torah and Quran ...
please share where it is mentioned in Quran that abraham was in mesopotamia?
however, Torah mentions egypt and Quran mentions misr which is universally known as egypt and also both mentiob pharaoh/firawn (unless you do not think firawn is pharaoh)
Perhaps you did not understand what I wrote in my last post. I believe the parts of the Torah that match the Quran. I believe in all of the Quran and I believe in the parts of the Torah that fit in with the Quran. For example, there is no mention of incest in the Quran but there is in the current translation of the Torah and I do not believe prophets would commit incest, therefore I do not believe that part of the Torah.
Both Torah and Quran refer to "mitzrayim" and "misr", which you translate as Egypt and I translate as Mesopotamia. You back this idea of "misr" equals Egypt with the word "firaun" which you translate as pharaoh and I translate as tyrant/aggressor. I prefer to look at the meaning and origin of the words used in the religious books to see if they become more clear. All names (proper nouns) have meanings which are either common nouns, adjectives, verbs or adverbs.
if in 1000 years another place is called UK ... what does that change?? if a story is about today, so in 1000 years it would still be about the UK as it is today no matter what the UK would be in 1000 years
My point is that geographic borders change over the years due to wars and conquering of countries. They are renamed and assimilated into the conquering land. What was once Palestine is now Israel, what was once Mesopotamia is now Syria,Turkey, Iraq and so on. How would one know where the original borders/boundaries were? The only way one would know is if the land was defined by geological boundaries like mountains, oceans, rivers and so on. This is exactly the case with Mesopotamia, the land between two rivers, "mitzrayim". These very same rivers are mentioned by "firaun". Egypt is only famous for the Nile whereas Mesopotamia is known for the Tigris and Euphrates.
And Pharaoh proclaimed among his people, saying: "O my people! Does not the dominion of Egypt belong to me, (witness) these streams flowing underneath my (palace)? What! see ye not then?
43:51 |ونادى - And called out| فرعون - Firaun| في - among| قومه - his people;| قال - he said,| يا - O| قوم - "O my people!| أليس - Is not| لي - for me| ملك - (the) kingdom| مصر - (of) Egypt| وهذه - and these| الأنهار - [the] rivers| تجري - flowing| من - underneath me?| تحتي - underneath me?| أفلا - Then do not| تبصرون - you see?|
you find it hard to believe that monkeys/apes and swine were created from humans (5:60) and that sabbath transgressors were turned into despicable apes (2:65 and 7:166) ... The God is capable of all things, so why do you find it hard to believe if i may ask?
and how do you please understand 5:60, 2:65, and 7:166??
(please note that 2:66 mentions they (2:65) were made as exemplary punishement)
also please note that as per my understanding 5:60 is a very different event than 2:65 and 7:166 (whether 2:65 and 7:166 refer to same town .. perhaps perhaps not ...
in any case for me 2:65 and 7:166 refer to what scientists call “human-ape ancestor” whilst 5:60 refers to the creation of swine and monkeys/apes as we know them)
I do not believe that these humans who broke the sabbath were magically and instantly transformed into monkeys as they were standing. Nor do I believe that this transformation happened gradually in that same lifetime. I believe in karma and reincarnation so I believe that this was their destiny for the future life that they would reincarnate into.
2:65, 5:60 and 7:166 are all referring to the same incident and concept. All these ayats are referring to the sabbath and what the Jews are allowed to consume. 2:66 is referring to the sabbath being made as a lesson for the Jews of that time and their descendants.
i do believe fossils were found ... i do not believe the dates attributed to the fossils
That would make it impossible to know which discovered fossil is dated the oldest and which is the youngest, which in turn would make it impossible to know where humans originated from.
I believe this verse refers to whom scientists refer to as "human-ape ancestor" ... there is no such ancestor, but rather sabbath transgressors who were made into "despicable apes" .. and all fossils have been found in Africa .. so I believe misr is definitely in Africa and it is Egypt
Fossils have been discovered all over the world, not only in Africa. If you do not believe the dates attributed to these findings, then how do you know which fossil is the oldest one discovered and which one is the youngest? By this logic, the fossils found in Australia could predate the ones in Africa. Does that mean that "misr" is in Australia?

Regards,
Janet