Author Topic: THE SIGN  (Read 1330 times)

Mr.Q

  • Apprentice
  • **
  • Posts: 228
Re: THE SIGN
« Reply #10 on: November 28, 2011, 03:07:44 PM »
Appreciate if you can give detail explanation for verse 47:4 especially the meaning of 'Therefore, if you encounter those who have rejected, then strike the necks'.

47:4  Therefore, if you encounter those who have rejected, then strike the necks; until you bind them, then secure the cords. You may then either set them free or ransom them, until the war ends. That, and if God had willed, He alone could have beaten them, but He thus tests you by one another. As for those who get killed in the cause of God, He will never let their deeds be put to waste.

Salam,
I fail to see the question here. The rules of war are clear. If you are being attacked and killed for your belief in God, as the prophet and the believers were, then God gave them permission to fight back. The rules for war and the rules for peace are clear and simple to understand.

My question to you is if you believe in God, why don't you follow His Guidance that He revealed?

Jafar

  • Advanced Truth Seeker
  • ****
  • Posts: 1870
  • Gender: Male
Re: THE SIGN
« Reply #11 on: November 28, 2011, 06:41:22 PM »
Appreciate if you can give detail explanation for verse 47:4 especially the meaning of 'Therefore, if you encounter those who have rejected, then strike the necks'.
47:4  Therefore, if you encounter those who have rejected, then strike the necks; until you bind them, then secure the cords. You may then either set them free or ransom them, until the war ends. That, and if God had willed, He alone could have beaten them, but He thus tests you by one another. As for those who get killed in the cause of God, He will never let their deeds be put to waste.

There are certain group of people who just cannot be reasoned and quickly resorted to violence.
They create disorders and love to oppress other people..
For those group of people it's allowable to wage war against them until order are being restored and oppressions are no more.. 

Few weeks ago I've met some fellows from the Ahmadis.. although I disagree with their view/belief... but I told them if the sunnis/salafis majority burn your houses, torture and murder your relatives and perform injustice over you.. (such as commonly found especially in Pakistan) and the government does nothing to protect you.. then FIGHT THEM BACK! Take arms! Stand up! and defend your rights! Until they stop their injustice over you... If you can't do that.. then it's better to migrate away to other safe places and expose to the world regarding their brutality over you..

Salam / Peace
The Arabs (al-arabu) are the worst in rejection and hypocrisy, and more likely not to know the limits of what God has sent upon His messenger
9:97

And yes it's written as Al-Arabu and not Al-Badawi or Badawiyun..
*For those who had a hard time accepting this fact..

youssef4342

  • Advanced Truth Seeker
  • ****
  • Posts: 1204
  • Gender: Male
Re: THE SIGN
« Reply #12 on: November 29, 2011, 10:45:33 AM »
Appreciate if you can give detail explanation for verse 47:4 especially the meaning of 'Therefore, if you encounter those who have rejected, then strike the necks'.

47:4  Therefore, if you encounter those who have rejected, then strike the necks; until you bind them, then secure the cords. You may then either set them free or ransom them, until the war ends. That, and if God had willed, He alone could have beaten them, but He thus tests you by one another. As for those who get killed in the cause of God, He will never let their deeds be put to waste.
Peace  :peace:
This verse has to also conform with other verses of the Quran.

 Fight in the cause of God against those who attack you, but do not aggress. God does not love the aggressors(2:190)
وَقَاتِلُوا فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّـهِ الَّذِينَ يُقَاتِلُونَكُمْ وَلَا تَعْتَدُوا ۚ إِنَّ اللَّـهَ لَا يُحِبُّ الْمُعْتَدِينَ ﴿١٩٠﴾

**** Thus you cannot simply attack any disbeliever, unless if THEY attack you.
Facebook Group
https://www.facebook.com/groups/310518545650653/

Youtube:
www.youtube.com/QuranicIslam101

"Fear not those who can kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather fear the one who can destroy both the soul and the body in hell." (Matthew 10:28)

Student of Allah

  • Advanced Truth Seeker
  • ****
  • Posts: 1157
Re: THE SIGN
« Reply #13 on: November 29, 2011, 12:23:45 PM »
Shalom,

I don't recall any misconduct towards me from your part when we addressed the same topic.

The problem I face, when I look at your questions is a bit strange. The questions would have made sense halfway through the revelation of Qur'an. Thus Allah detailing his ayaats for the patient ones. But now that the revelation is complete (it's a long time now). I give no one ANY EXCUSE of isolating something from the ENTIRE SCRIPTURE and asking questions based on that. It is intellectually dishonest for any student of knowledge to do so.

About chronology, go figure out which way its more likely to be stated:

1. X and Y throws a party and gets married happily. X kills Y.
                                          or
2. X kills Y. X and Y throws a party and gets married happily.

You do not set free someone and set conditions of captivity. You set conditions of captivity and then free. Once you set someone free, by definition they are not captive.

I am not here to debate. Sorry if I made it looks so. However, if I give a speech to an audience, I would love very much to see them make sense of the overall by correlating relevant parts of the speech. Not by isolating them.

PEACE be on you, May God guide you to success.

------------------------- Student of Allah   

A2Z

  • Apprentice
  • **
  • Posts: 116
Re: THE SIGN
« Reply #14 on: December 03, 2011, 12:43:36 AM »
When you are at the other side of the court it takes a lot of thinking before you can penned down your thoughts to minimize offensive statements. Hope I managed to achieve it in this writing and make this post a better ‘place’ for exchanging thoughts and opinions.

During my kid’s days I’m lucky to experience both village and city’s life. Experienced both animism and secular way of life which later transformed to Sunni’s way of life. City’s life is almost the same with other cities in the world whereby money is everything. People are busy with their life and religion’s teachings not really effective to mold them. Village life is the one that changed a lot. Although we are Muslims community, the animism practices still there and mainly because the peoples knowledge in science, technology and Islam still very low or almost none in early 70’s. Believe in demigods or spirits or ‘djins’ or ‘keepers’ still strong and influenced village life significantly. They tried not to make these creatures angry so that they will not harm the villagers. It is not as bad as the case of the Arab during pre-Islamic period. They do believe in Allah and prayed to Him to provide rain during the drought season and stop it when flood came but Allah was not alone in His kingdom.

The community consists of a leader which supported by a group of imam(s), the wise ones and the elders, commoners and the most sought after entity during disaster and illness, the shamans. There are two types of shaman, orthodox who recited mantras in our mother tongue and the ‘Quranist’ type who recited mantras in Arabic.

However, it is the imams, wise ones and elders that ensured the laws and orders of the community in place, including taboos. Peoples lived their life according to the ways molded by this group of peoples. Their thoughts really matters and seems to be carved onto stones. It is important for each individual in the community to align his or her way of life set by them to void punishment and the worst one was being out casted by the community. We need each other help during padi’s planting and harvesting seasons, marriage ceremonies, funeral etc.

Things changed now. With the advancement of science and technology the service of the shamans no longer required by many and the fellowship of the community leader, imams, wise ones and elders broke as people becoming more educated. People do sought advice from these peoples but there will always be a room for second opinion and most importantly room for logic, reasoning, common sense and rationalism. Nowadays, there is no such thing as everything was fixed or ‘carved onto stones’ for someone to live life. Out casted is not a big issue as individuals able to carry on with their life with or without others support. Almost everything has a price nowadays even for an imam.

The point I’m trying to make here is that, the wind or wave of common sense, logic, reasoning and rationalism has and is slowly eroding the ways of life which earlier thought to be carved on stone, fixed and no change. Quran also not being spared from this wave as we can observe right over here in this site, Quranists are trying to ‘clean-up’ Quran’s verses to suit their thoughts and principles. Issues like polygamy, ‘right hand possessed’, slavery etc. being viewed in different perspective as the original Arabic words seems not fitting the readers’ mind. There are cases whereby Arabic words being left out after being translated to other language. It is not just the Quranists that doing this, the modern thinkers of the others sects also doing the same as they realized some of the verses in the Quran needs to be re-translated and re-interpreted  to suit modern civilization and thinking. It is a slow process and it is the Quranists who championed this as they have a good and effective tool, the internet and best of all, they are not limited by the hadiths and sunnahs of the prophet. We are yet to witness the big wave when the Quranists ready to emerge from their virtual world into the real world to materialize their version of Quran’s ways of life. Are Quranists ready?

Follow-up on the verse 47:4 discussion, actually I’ve read few translations in English and my own language, Quranist’s version, which giving more extreme understanding and out of humanity value. Example as below:

Sahih International: So when you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if Allah had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of Allah - never will He waste their deeds.

I don’t know Arabic but these translators surely have some base to translate the Arabic words or sentences of verse 47:4 into this manner. Maybe they try to be honest to knowledge or maybe they don’t really understand the whole context of Quran.


Dear Jaafar,

Actually Quran has solution for the Sunni/Salafis vs Ahmadis’s issue and for all the conflicts in the Muslim's world but none of the Muslims believe in Quran. Here is the solution from Quran.

49:9 And if two parties of believers battle with each other, you shall reconcile them; but if one of them aggresses against the other, then you shall fight the one aggressing until it complies with the command of God. Once it complies, then you shall reconcile the two groups with justice, and be equitable; for God loves those who are equitable.

Where are you Quranists? Isn’t this is your responsibility? Why are you hiding in this virtual world? Go out  and uphold your God’s words.


Dear Mr.Q, youssef4342 and Student of Allah,

I’ve read your reply to me and please find my reply in this writing. Please be informed that I was not going to put Quran in acid test anymore but more to understand how Quranists going to prove their version of Quran is the one that going to make this world a better place to live.

WhereIsTheTruth

  • Apprentice
  • **
  • Posts: 252
  • Gender: Female
Re: THE SIGN
« Reply #15 on: December 03, 2011, 01:52:25 AM »
DEAR AZ2

Quote
The point I’m trying to make here is that, the wind or wave of common sense, logic, reasoning and rationalism has and is slowly eroding the ways of life which earlier thought to be carved on stone, fixed and no change. Quran also not being spared from this wave as we can observe right over here in this site, Quranists are trying to ‘clean-up’ Quran’s verses to suit their thoughts and principles. Issues like polygamy, ‘right hand possessed’, slavery etc. being viewed in different perspective as the original Arabic words seems not fitting the readers’ mind. There are cases whereby Arabic words being left out after being translated to other language. It is not just the Quranists that doing this, the modern thinkers of the others sects also doing the same as they realized some of the verses in the Quran needs to be re-translated and re-interpreted  to suit modern civilization and thinking. It 

Your point is baseless and meaningsless. Quranists are NOT trying to clean anything up, we are only trying to understand quran in the light of the original unaltered arabic words.

You know what your problem is? That you insist that sunni-version is the right islam. How many times haven't people told you that we are not sunnites? Your examples of polygamy, right hands possessed (whatever that means) slavery etc. are viewed differently only because we dont have any ahadith to support these craps.

The quran does not need to be re-translated or re-interpreted, it only needs to be understood without ahadith and in its orginal meaning and than it would fit every timeage and every century.

Again and again you try to blackmail people in this forum by sunnism, you somehow wants us to feel sorry for what the sunniites did or do, and you somehow wants us to excuse and defend their actions or their understanding of the quran. Why should we do that when we have nothing to do with them??? Now shall I also blame you for what secular Stalin did?
Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it

My contact prayer, and my rites, and my life, and my death, are all to God, Lord of the worlds.

huruf

  • Wise One / Burnout
  • *****
  • Posts: 2113
Re: THE SIGN
« Reply #16 on: December 03, 2011, 02:03:35 AM »
I agree with what whereisthetruth says.

AZ2 still seems to give credit to traditional, translations or (mis)understandings of the truthful Qur'an and taking for granted that any new way of looking at the Qur'an taking it as the sole source of understanding of itself is some twisting of Arabic. It often happens also that many peole comlain because "traitionalists" understand Qur'an "litterally", but that is precisely what traditionalists do not do. They do not take the Qur'an litterally. They take it to fit their "traditional", understanding.

It is when I started leaving asie traditonal understandings of the Qur'an in ayas where there was conflict and looking only exclusively at the Qur'an (and that is very difficult to do, not to be conditonned) that right and clear and simple things came to light literally.

Please stop gving to "traditionalists" the benefi of the doubt of literalism, they are not litteral. But of course their translations, for somebody who cannot look at the Arabic, will be literal, of course then they are not bound anymore by the unchanging word of Qur'an.

You AZ2 shoudl look at many threads where many questions are being dealt with and see where litteralism rules. And take your time. knots that have been tied many centuries, are not easily undone. But those who revere God's word should have the patience to do just that and that cannot be done in a hurry.

But, for God's sake do not take things for granted just because many peoole say them, or because the same people do not tire repeating them.

But if you do, it is your loss, not snybody else's.

Salaam

WhereIsTheTruth

  • Apprentice
  • **
  • Posts: 252
  • Gender: Female
Re: THE SIGN
« Reply #17 on: December 03, 2011, 02:22:42 AM »
I agree with what whereisthetruth says.

AZ2 still seems to give credit to traditional, translations or (mis)understandings of the truthful Qur'an and taking for granted that any new way of looking at the Qur'an taking it as the sole source of understanding of itself is some twisting of Arabic. It often happens also that many peole comlain because "traitionalists" understand Qur'an "litterally", but that is precisely what traditionalists do not do. They do not take the Qur'an litterally. They take it to fit their "traditional", understanding.

It is when I started leaving asie traditonal understandings of the Qur'an in ayas where there was conflict and looking only exclusively at the Qur'an (and that is very difficult to do, not to be conditonned) that right and clear and simple things came to light literally.

Please stop gving to "traditionalists" the benefi of the doubt of literalism, they are not litteral. But of course their translations, for somebody who cannot look at the Arabic, will be literal, of course then they are not bound anymore by the unchanging word of Qur'an.

You AZ2 shoudl look at many threads where many questions are being dealt with and see where litteralism rules. And take your time. knots that have been tied many centuries, are not easily undone. But those who revere God's word should have the patience to do just that and that cannot be done in a hurry.

But, for God's sake do not take things for granted just because many peoole say them, or because the same people do not tire repeating them.

But if you do, it is your loss, not snybody else's.

Salaam

So right. That man just cannot understand we are not here to defend quran, since its only God who defends the quran. We are here to learn what the quran says without the hadith. This man also claims, that when we disagrees with the sunnites than it means that we are 're-interpretating' the quran in order to fit our minds. Ironically he does not consider the sectarians as 're-interpretating the quran' in order to fit their hadith agenda. This only shows, that he think sectarian islam is true islam.
Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it

My contact prayer, and my rites, and my life, and my death, are all to God, Lord of the worlds.

A2Z

  • Apprentice
  • **
  • Posts: 116
Re: THE SIGN
« Reply #18 on: December 03, 2011, 03:52:26 AM »
So right. That man just cannot understand we are not here to defend quran, since its only God who defends the quran. We are here to learn what the quran says without the hadith. This man also claims, that when we disagrees with the sunnites than it means that we are 're-interpretating' the quran in order to fit our minds. Ironically he does not consider the sectarians as 're-interpretating the quran' in order to fit their hadith agenda. This only shows, that he think sectarian islam is true islam.

Dear WhereIsTheTruth,

It seems that something had confused your mind. It is regarding 'Muhammad', name of prophet.

Today in 'Film Making and encouraging haram?' post you mentioned prophet name as 'Muhammad'. Refer below:

propher muhammed himself stated that you should not have anything to do with pork or sex, and know mashallah you want to make a movie on that so remember that prophet muhammad is angry with you.

But in 'Dr. Subhi Mansour on the term "muhsanat" in the Koran' post, you quoted;

NOPE. Who says it was the caliphs who put the prophets teachings into book? and who says prophets name was muhammad? look, i am not a hadither.

And when I confirmed this state-of-confusion of yours, you replied:

You are right, dude. But whats wrong with that? I really like contruktive critic. So if you want to give me feedback, go ahead.

The problem however, as I see it is, that your picture of islam is that of a religion with a special dogma. Let me clearify a few points

1. Islam IS NOT A RELIGION
2. God does NOT care about your religion, what he cares about is your actions
3. MUSLIM means a submitter to God, and you achieve that status by virtue, honor, respect, good deeds and healthy thoughts.

Peace

The character that you are displaying is giving negative impact to Quranist's reputations. You are among those who being guided by Allah and please be one.

WhereIsTheTruth

  • Apprentice
  • **
  • Posts: 252
  • Gender: Female
Re: THE SIGN
« Reply #19 on: December 03, 2011, 05:30:17 AM »
Dear WhereIsTheTruth,

It seems that something had confused your mind. It is regarding 'Muhammad', name of prophet.

Today in 'Film Making and encouraging haram?' post you mentioned prophet name as 'Muhammad'. Refer below:

But in 'Dr. Subhi Mansuour on the term "muhsanat" in the Koran' post, you quoted;

And when I confirmed this state-of-confusion of yours, you replied:

The character that you are displaying is giving negative impact to Quranist's reputations. You are among those who being guided by Allah and please be one.

Dear az2. It is great to see the attention you give my posts. Always good to have admirers. But sadly you didn't had brain cell enough to understand that I was being sarcastic in my post to 'film making and encouraging Haram'. You seriously lack sense.

Frankly if anyone is confused than its you, you avoid difficult questions post to you and you keep insist that sunnism is true islam. You was not even able to answer my post to you.
 
Honestly, i find it very, VERY hard to take you serious, and so do most people in this forum.
Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it

My contact prayer, and my rites, and my life, and my death, are all to God, Lord of the worlds.