« on: May 21, 2016, 10:24:34 AM »
i did not say its the first one , i said its the oldest one till date. may be we will find more older than this one in near future, before five years ago who was aware about it.What I wanted to say is that maybe the first one was 2000 or 3000 years ago, we can not say anything about the first one by a found copy.
netherland why you are going so far, some years ago research happened here about jesus christ, moses, noah , but they did not find anything apart from bibilical stories ,I live there.
BLUE: And this has not to be neglected. Why can't we find outside sources?
btw the strange thing is that the "oldest" one (Noah) has more external sources than the younger ones. Everywhere in the world there are some legends and myths about an event which has great similarities with Noah's story.
its not my headache as i told you bible may contain words of God but also words of other sources, so the stories of bible must be match with quran its something normal and logical, but the stories should filter through quran , if its going agaisnt quran we should be careful.Maybe it's not your headache, but for those who want to study the origin these kind of things have not to be neglected.